EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 44/2009
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Thompson Meat Machinery Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0714649 which covers meat mincing and/or mixing machines.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 44/2009 was made on 19 November 2008. It revokes TCO 0714649 as the CEO is satisfied that Thompson Meat Machinery Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.44/2009, TCO 0714649, was revoked on 19 November 2008 with the Revocation date of effect as from 9 October 2008.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, addresses the need for a framework governing the concession of tariffs on imported goods. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act establishes a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders allow for lower rates of customs duty on certain goods, provided they are not substitutable by goods produced domestically. In 2008, the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 44/2009 was introduced to address the issue of revoking a TCO when a domestic producer claims that they could produce the substitutable goods. This instrument revokes TCO 0714649 concerning meat mincing and/or mixing machines, following a request by Thompson Meat Machinery Pty Ltd, on the basis that the CEO was satisfied with the producer's capacity and that the TCO would not have been issued if the request had been made on the original application date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 44/2009, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that provide for lower rates of customs duty on specific goods. The instrument specifically addresses the revocation of TCO 0714649, which concerns meat mincing and/or mixing machines, following a request by Thompson Meat Machinery Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable to those covered by the TCO. The Act allows for the revocation of a TCO if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs is satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the TCO would not have been made if the request for revocation were the application date. The revocation instrument has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia as it is made under federal legislation. The revocation is effective from the date the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, despite legislative constraints on retrospective legislative instruments, ensuring the process adheres to the statutory requirements while maintaining the integrity of the customs duty scheme.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 44/2009 revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0714649, which pertains to meat mincing and/or mixing machines. This revocation is based on the provisions outlined in sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, and 269SC of the Customs Act 1901. Section 269C allows for the creation of a TCO if certain criteria are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. Conversely, section 269SB permits a producer of substitutable goods to request the revocation of a TCO if they believe they could produce the goods in Australia. Under section 269SC, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requesting party is indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the current circumstances were the same as those on the application day.
The obligations under this Act primarily fall on the CEO of Customs and the applicant requesting the revocation. The CEO must ensure that all requests for revocation are thoroughly assessed against the criteria specified in section 269SC. This includes verifying that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the conditions at the time of the request meet the requirements that would have been considered at the time of the original application. Additionally, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette, as stipulated in section 269SC(1A), detailing the request for revocation and the particulars of the TCO in question. This transparency measure ensures that all interested parties are informed of the process and the rationale behind the revocation.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the explanatory statement for the breach of the provisions related to the revocation of a TCO. However, the process outlined in the Customs Act 1901 implies that any procedural missteps or non-compliance with the statutory requirements could potentially lead to legal challenges or disputes. The revocation process itself is governed by the statutory provisions, and adherence to these is crucial to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. The revocation of TCO 0714649, effective from 9 October 2008, exemplifies the CEO's duty to act in accordance with the legislative framework and the importance of timely and accurate application of the Act's provisions.