EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 4/2008
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Loumet Nominees Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 9903454 which covers training ball sets.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 4/2008 was made on 4 December 2007. It revokes TCO 9903454 as the CEO is satisfied that Loumet Nominees Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.4/2008, TCO 9903454, was revoked on 4 December 2007 with the Revocation date of effect as from 2 October 2007.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 4/2008 was enacted to address a specific issue within the Customs Act 1901, particularly concerning the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that provide reduced rates of customs duty on certain imported goods. This instrument was introduced to respond to requests for the revocation of TCOs when a domestic producer claims that they could produce the goods in Australia, thereby negating the original rationale for the tariff concession. The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duties and the issuance and revocation of tariff concessions, ensuring that domestic industries are protected under certain conditions. The policy objective behind this instrument is to maintain a balance between supporting Australian industry and facilitating competitive imports, by revoking concessions when domestic production capabilities are established.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 4/2008 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to reduce the customs duty on certain goods, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. This Act governs the revocation of such concessions if a producer in Australia claims to produce substitutable goods. Specifically, the Instrument revokes TCO 9903454 for training ball sets following a request by Loumet Nominees Pty Ltd, as the CEO is satisfied that they are a producer of substitutable goods and that the concession would not have been granted had the request been made on the application date. The Act operates at the Commonwealth level and applies to entities and individuals engaged in the importation of goods and the production of substitutable goods within Australia. The revocation of a TCO takes effect from the date the request to revoke was lodged, bypassing certain retrospective legislative constraints to ensure timely adjustments to tariff concessions.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 4/2008, pursuant to the Customs Act 1901, are sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD. These sections establish the criteria for making and revoking Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Section 269C and 269P detail the circumstances under which a TCO may be made, namely, if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application is lodged. Conversely, section 269SB allows for the revocation of a TCO if a producer in Australia claims to produce substitutable goods and requests the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke the TCO. Under section 269SC(1) and (3), the CEO must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the producer requesting revocation is indeed producing substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the request was made on the day the TCO application was lodged.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include the requirement for Loumet Nominees Pty Ltd to demonstrate to the CEO that they are a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. Additionally, the CEO has the obligation to review the application for revocation, determine whether the criteria for revocation are met, and publish a notice in the Gazette if a revocation request is made. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates, as mandated by section 269SC(1A). The CEO's decision to revoke the TCO must be based on the satisfaction that the producer of substitutable goods would indeed produce such goods on the day the TCO application was lodged, aligning with section 269SC(1) and (3).
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 4/2008 does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance with the Act. However, the Act itself under sections 269SC and 269SD establishes that the revocation of a TCO comes into force on the day the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, despite any prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments. The revocation of TCO 9903454, effective from 2 October 2007, demonstrates the CEO's compliance with these statutory requirements. Failure to adhere to these processes or making incorrect determinations could lead to legal challenges or further regulatory scrutiny, though the specific penalties for such breaches are not outlined in this particular Instrument.