Tariff Concession Revocation Order 37/2006

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2006L01314 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 37/2006

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Bruck Textiles Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0511363 which covers bed linen.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 37/2006 was made on 19 April 2006. It revokes TCO 0511363 as the CEO is satisfied that Bruck Textiles Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.37/2006 revoked 0511363 on 19 April 2006.

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 37/2006 was enacted to address the need for revocation of specific tariff concession orders under the Customs Act 1901. This legislation was introduced to provide a mechanism whereby the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can revoke tariff concession orders when circumstances change, particularly when Australian producers of substitutable goods emerge. The Customs Act 1901, as amended, allows for the imposition of lower rates of customs duty on goods subject to tariff concession orders, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. However, when a domestic producer of such goods arises, it is essential to revoke the tariff concession order to protect local industries. This revocation instrument was made by the CEO on 19 April 2006, following a request by Bruck Textiles Pty Ltd to revoke TCO 0511363, which covers bed linen, due to the emergence of local production. The revocation took effect on the day the request was lodged, in line with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, as amended by Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 37/2006, applies to any entity or individual that is affected by the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This includes businesses that may have benefited from the tariff concessions, such as importers and manufacturers of goods previously covered under a TCO, as well as those who may now face increased competition from domestic producers. The legislation operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction, meaning it has nationwide applicability across Australia. The Act allows for the revocation of a TCO if the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that a domestic producer of substitutable goods has emerged since the TCO was made, and that the CEO would not have made the TCO had the current situation existed at the time of the initial application. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions to its application, and its scope is further defined and potentially extended through subordinate instruments. The revocation of TCO 0511363, which covered bed linen, was enacted to reflect the emergence of Bruck Textiles Pty Ltd as a producer of substitutable goods in Australia.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 37/2006, made under section 269SB of the Customs Act 1901, addresses the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Specifically, section 269SB allows for the revocation of a TCO if a producer in Australia claims that they are producing goods that are substitutable to those covered by the TCO. The CEO of Customs, upon receiving such a request, must assess whether the producer is indeed producing substitutable goods and whether the TCO would not have been made if the request had been received on the day the original TCO application was lodged (subsection 269SC(1) and (3)). If both conditions are met, the CEO must revoke the TCO, which is what happened with TCO 0511363, covering bed linen, in this case. The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on parties or entities governed by it include the requirement for producers of substitutable goods to notify the CEO of their production capabilities if they believe a TCO should be revoked. The CEO, in turn, is obligated to publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation (subsection 269SC(1A)). This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO in question. The CEO must also make a decision on the revocation based on the criteria set out in the Act, ensuring that the decision is both timely and in compliance with the statutory requirements. The Act also delineates the consequences of breaches related to the revocation of TCOs. While the Act does not explicitly state offences, penalties, or criminal/civil consequences for non-compliance with the revocation process, it does provide a clear framework for the revocation of TCOs. The revocation process itself, governed by the Act, ensures that the tariff concessions are only applied when appropriate and that local production is not unduly disadvantaged. The revocation order takes effect on the day the request to revoke the TCO was lodged (subsection 269SC(6)), ensuring that any changes in the production landscape are promptly reflected in the customs duty regime. This swift action helps maintain the integrity and fairness of the customs duty system.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.