EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 35/2010
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0814987 which covers rock drilling and bolting rigs.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 35/2010 was made on 21 December 2009. It revokes TCO 0814987 as the CEO is satisfied that Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.35/2010, TCO 0814987, was revoked on 21 December 2009 with the Revocation date of effect as from 28 October 2009.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 35/2010 is an instrument made under the Customs Act 1901 to revoke a specific Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that provided reduced customs duty rates on certain rock drilling and bolting rigs. Enacted to address the problem of inappropriate tariff concessions when substitutable goods are produced in Australia, this instrument was introduced to ensure that customs duty rates are accurately reflective of the current production capabilities within the country. The revocation was initiated by Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd, which claimed to be a producer of substitutable goods. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, acting under the authority conferred by sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901. The policy objective is to maintain fair and effective trade practices by ensuring that tariff concessions are granted only when no substitutable goods are produced domestically.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 35/2010 revokes Tariff Concession Order 0814987 under the Customs Act 1901, applying to the cessation of lower customs duty rates for rock drilling and bolting rigs. This revocation follows a request by Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd, who claimed to be a producer in Australia of goods substitutable for those covered by the order. The Act applies to entities like Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd that can demonstrate the production of substitutable goods in Australia, thereby challenging the continued application of tariff concessions. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it pertains to customs duties across Australia. The revocation of a TCO is subject to certain conditions, including that on the day the revocation request was lodged, no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia, and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the request had been made on the original application date. The revocation takes immediate effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, despite the general prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments, ensuring the swift application of the changes.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 35/2010, pursuant to sections 269SB and 269SC of the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0814987, which pertained to rock drilling and bolting rigs. This revocation was enacted as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs was satisfied that Joy Mining Machinery Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia, could manufacture goods that are substitutable for those covered by the TCO and that the TCO would not have been issued had the request for revocation been made on the date of the original application for the TCO. The Instrument came into effect on the date the revocation request was lodged, 28 October 2009.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the CEO and other parties involved. The CEO must, under section 269SC(1A), publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for the revocation of a TCO. This notice must include a statement confirming the receipt of the request and the full details of the TCO in question. Additionally, the CEO is mandated by section 269SC(1) to revoke the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the TCO would not have been made if the revocation request had been made on the date of the original application. This ensures that tariff concessions are only granted in the absence of local production of substitutable goods.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the revocation of TCOs, may result in various civil and criminal consequences. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Customs Act can lead to fines and other penalties as prescribed by the Act. The seriousness of the offence, along with any previous breaches, may influence the extent of the penalties imposed. The Act also allows for potential legal action to be taken against individuals or entities that do not adhere to its requirements.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 35/2010 effectively revokes TCO 0814987, aligning with the Act's provisions to ensure tariff concessions are only granted in the absence of local production. The CEO's obligations to publish notices and revoke TCOs upon meeting specific criteria are clearly outlined, and while the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed, they may include fines and other legal consequences as stipulated by the Customs Act.