Tariff Concession Revocation Order 31/2011

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L02353 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 31/2011

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Steinert Australia Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0606830 which covers magnetic wet drum separators.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 31/2011 was made on 8 December 2009. It revokes TCO 0606830 as the CEO is satisfied that Steinert Australia Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.31/2011, TCO 0606830, was revoked on 8 December 2009 with the Revocation date of effect as from 14 October 2009.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to establish and regulate customs and excise duties, and it plays a crucial role in managing Australia's international trade. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 31/2011, which was introduced to address the specific issue of revoking tariff concession orders when there is a change in the availability of substitutable goods in Australia, further refines the framework under the Customs Act. This instrument was created to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted when there is a genuine need, thereby supporting domestic industries by preventing unfair competition from imported goods. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, in accordance with sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, and 269SC of the Act, and it aims to maintain a fair and balanced trade environment by revoking tariff concessions when local production of substitutable goods commences.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework for the imposition of customs duties on goods entering Australia, and includes provisions for the granting and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to ensure fair trade practices. Specifically, under Part XVA of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can make or revoke TCOs, which apply lower rates of customs duty to specified goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 31/2011 revokes TCO 0606830 for magnetic wet drum separators in response to a request from Steinert Australia Pty Ltd, a domestic producer of substitutable goods. The revocation is effective from 14 October 2009, the date the revocation request was lodged. The Act applies to individuals and entities involved in the production and importation of goods within Australia, particularly those subject to or affected by TCOs. The revocation of TCOs is subject to the CEO's satisfaction that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the concession should not have been granted. This revocation instrument extends the application of the Customs Act by providing a mechanism for revoking tariff concessions that have been found to be no longer justifiable.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 31/2011 (the Instrument) pertain to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0606830. Under section 269SC(1) and (3) of the Customs Act 1901, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is required to revoke a TCO if they are satisfied that the applicant for revocation is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable to the goods covered by the TCO, and if the CEO would not have made the TCO had it been the day of the original application but without the TCO in force. The Instrument revokes TCO 0606830 based on these criteria being met by Steinert Australia Pty Ltd. The Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO and the applicant for the revocation of a TCO. The CEO must ensure that the necessary criteria outlined in section 269SC(1) and (3) are met before revoking a TCO. This includes verifying that the applicant is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO under the conditions of the original application date. Additionally, under subsection 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, providing details of the TCO and the request. Under the Customs Act 1901, the revocation of a TCO is subject to specific civil and administrative consequences. If the CEO fails to comply with the provisions requiring the revocation of a TCO when the criteria are met, this could lead to legal challenges or administrative reviews. However, the explanatory statement does not explicitly outline criminal or civil penalties for such failures. The revocation of a TCO as per the Instrument takes effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, as specified in subsection 269SC(6), which operates despite the prohibitions under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 concerning retrospective legislative instruments. The Instrument was made on 8 December 2009 and revoked TCO 0606830 with an effective revocation date of 14 October 2009. This revocation was grounded on the CEO's satisfaction that Steinert Australia Pty Ltd fulfilled the conditions for revocation as stipulated in the Act. The revocation was published in the Gazette, adhering to the requirement under subsection 269SC(1A) to inform the public of the revocation request and details of the TCO. This transparency ensures that all stakeholders are aware of changes to the tariff concessions regime.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.