Tariff Concession Revocation Order 31/2005

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2005L03967 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Revocation Instrument 31/2005

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Red Roo Sales & Service Company Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0510002 which covers Woodchippers and/or Mulchers.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 31/2005 was made on 5 December 2005.  It revokes TCO 0510002 as the CEO is satisfied that Red Roo Sales & Service Company Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.31/2005 revoked 0510002 on 5 December 2005.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to manage the import and export of goods and provide a framework for tariff concessions. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 31/2005 was introduced to address the problem of revoking tariff concessions in cases where a domestic producer of substitutable goods claims that they have begun production and the concession is no longer justified. The instrument empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke a Tariff Concession Order if it is established that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the concession would not have been granted if the application had been made on the day the revocation request was lodged. This revocation mechanism ensures that the benefits of tariff concessions are properly aligned with the economic realities of domestic production, thereby promoting fair trade practices and supporting local industries.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). The Act applies to entities that import goods and producers of goods that may be substitutable for those covered by a TCO. The legislation allows for a lower rate of customs duty on goods that are the subject of a TCO if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of the application for the concession. The scope of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The CEO can revoke a TCO if a producer in Australia of substitutable goods requests its revocation and if the CEO is satisfied that the producer would not have been making the goods on the day the original TCO application was lodged. The revocation is effective from the day the request is lodged, notwithstanding any prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 31/2005, which revoked TCO 0510002 covering Woodchippers and/or Mulchers, was made on 5 December 2005, following a request from Red Roo Sales & Service Company Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia of substitutable goods.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this Instrument, made under the Customs Act 1901, involve the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Specifically, section 269SB allows a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke the TCO. If the CEO is satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that they would not have made the TCO if the request had been lodged on the day the original application was made, they must revoke the TCO (sections 269SC(1) and (3)). This revocation process is set out in Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 31/2005, which revokes TCO 0510002 on 5 December 2005. This revocation takes effect on the day the request was made. The obligations imposed by the Act include the requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates (subsection 269SC(1A)). Additionally, the CEO must ensure that the order revoking the TCO comes into force on the day the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, despite any contrary provisions in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (subsections 269SC(6) and 239SD(8)). The Instrument also details the consequences of breaches. However, the explanatory statement does not explicitly mention any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of the Act or the Instrument. It is important to note that while the explanatory statement provides a detailed account of the process and requirements, it does not specify the potential penalties or consequences for non-compliance with the Act or the Instrument. For detailed information on penalties, one would need to refer to the Customs Act 1901 or seek legal advice.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.