EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 30/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Actron Engineering Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 1035707 which covers heating and cooling air conditioners.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 30/2011 was made on 20 December 2010. It revokes TCO 1035707 as the CEO is satisfied that Actron Engineering Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.30/2011, TCO 1035707, was revoked on 20 December 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 12 November 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework for administering customs and excise duties, including a mechanism for granting and revoking tariff concession orders (TCOs). The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 30/2011 was introduced to address the specific issue of revoking a TCO when a domestic producer claims that they can manufacture the goods in question, thereby rendering the tariff concession unnecessary. The instrument revokes TCO 1035707 for heating and cooling air conditioners following a request by Actron Engineering Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia, who claimed to be capable of producing substitutable goods. This revocation took place on 20 December 2010, with an effective date of 12 November 2010, and aligns with the legislative intent to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted when there is a genuine need, as evidenced by the absence of domestic production of the relevant goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 30/2011, under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 1035707, which originally covered heating and cooling air conditioners. This instrument applies to Actron Engineering Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia of goods that are deemed substitutable to those covered by the TCO. The Act mandates that a TCO is subject to revocation if a producer in Australia of substitutable goods requests it and if the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that such goods are being produced in Australia and that the TCO would not have been issued if the request had been made on the day the original application for the TCO was lodged. The revocation of TCO 1035707 is effective from 12 November 2010, as per the instrument's provisions. The revocation process adheres to the legislative requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette once a revocation request is received, ensuring transparency in the process. The revocation order takes effect on the day the revocation request was made, notwithstanding the prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments as per the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 30/2011 relate to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 1035707, which previously provided a lower rate of customs duty on heating and cooling air conditioners (sections 269C, 269P, 269SB). The instrument was made under sections 269SC(1) and 269SC(3) of the Customs Act 1901, where the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is required to revoke a TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the TCO would not have been made if it were being considered on the day of the revocation request. The instrument itself revokes TCO 1035707 effective from 12 November 2010, the date the request to revoke was lodged.
The Customs Act 1901 imposes obligations on the CEO of Customs, requiring them to consider requests for the revocation of a TCO and make an order to revoke the TCO if certain conditions are met. Under section 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, providing details of the TCO in question. The Act also requires the CEO to ensure that any revocation order takes effect from the date the request was lodged, as stipulated in section 269SC(6), even if this means creating a retrospective effect, which is otherwise prohibited by section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (subsection 239SD(8)).
In terms of consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with the requirements to revoke a TCO upon a valid request. However, failure to adhere to the legislative process could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative actions against the CEO for not fulfilling their statutory obligations. Additionally, the revocation of a TCO may result in increased customs duties for the goods previously covered by the concession, impacting importers and potentially leading to financial repercussions for businesses that relied on the lower duty rates.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 30/2011 revokes TCO 1035707, which had been in place for heating and cooling air conditioners. The revocation is effective from 12 November 2010, the date the revocation request was lodged. The CEO was satisfied that Actron Engineering Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that, if the TCO had not been in force on that date, it would not have been made. This revocation means that the previously lower customs duty rates on these goods will no longer apply, potentially increasing the financial burden on importers of these goods.