Tariff Concession Revocation Order 29/2006

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2006L01126 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 29/2006

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Shinagawa Refractories Australia Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0516065 which covers resin bond hot repair refractory powder.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 29/2006 was made on 4 April 2006. It revokes TCO 0516065 as the CEO is satisfied that Shinagawa Refractories Australia Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.29/2006 revoked 0516065 on 4 April 2006.

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 29/2006, enacted on 4 April 2006, addresses a specific issue identified within the Customs Act 1901 by revoking a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that granted a lower rate of customs duty on resin bond hot repair refractory powder. The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework for the imposition of customs duty and allows for the revocation of TCOs under certain conditions, such as the emergence of domestic production of substitutable goods. The revocation was prompted by a request from Shinagawa Refractories Australia Pty Ltd, asserting their capability to produce the specified goods domestically. The enacting body, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, was satisfied that the company was indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that, in the absence of the TCO, the concession would not have been granted. The policy objective underpinning this revocation is to ensure that tariff concessions are only maintained in the absence of domestic production, thereby supporting local industries and preventing undue advantages for imported goods.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 29/2006 is an instrument under the Customs Act 1901, specifically operating within Part XVA, which pertains to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The Act applies to entities and individuals involved in the production of goods within Australia, particularly those who may request the revocation of TCOs if they are producing substitutable goods. This instrument revokes TCO 0516065 for resin bond hot repair refractory powder as a result of a request by Shinagawa Refractories Australia Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods. The revocation is effective from the date the request was lodged, thus it commenced on 4 April 2006. This revocation is geographically applicable across the Commonwealth of Australia. There are no specific exclusions or thresholds outlined in the explanatory statement, and the application of the Act is not extended or restricted through subordinate instruments in this particular case.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 29/2006 operates under the Customs Act 1901 (sections 269C, 269P, 269SC) to revoke a previously made Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0516065. This order, which was concerned with resin bond hot repair refractory powder, was revoked following a request from Shinagawa Refractories Australia Pty Ltd, who claimed to be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. Pursuant to section 269SB of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) was obligated to consider the request if it met the statutory criteria, specifically that the applicant was a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the original TCO if the request had been made on the day the TCO application was originally lodged. Upon satisfying these conditions, the CEO issued the revocation order. The Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO, particularly when a request for the revocation of a TCO is made. Under section 269SC(1), the CEO must make an order to revoke the TCO if satisfied with the two statutory conditions. Additionally, the CEO is required under subsection 269SC(1A) to publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation, detailing the request and the full particulars of the TCO. This ensures transparency and informs the public of the proceedings. Failure to comply with the obligations under the Customs Act 1901 can result in various consequences. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences or penalties for non-compliance in this context, breaches of the Act generally could result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, section 283 of the Act provides for a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units for serious breaches. In cases where the revocation of a TCO is concerned, non-compliance with the statutory obligations might lead to legal challenges, fines, or other civil remedies, as the Act aims to ensure fair and lawful administration of tariff concessions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
International Trade Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.