Tariff Concession Revocation Order 28/2009

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2009L03247 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 28/2009

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Rhine Ruhr Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0704649 which covers cooling tower packings.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 28/2009 was made on 28 September 2007. It revokes TCO 0704649 as the CEO is satisfied that Rhine Ruhr Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.28/2009, TCO 0704649, was revoked on 28 September 2007 with the Revocation date of effect as from 1 August 2007.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide for the regulation of customs and excise, including the imposition of duties on imported goods and the facilitation of the movement of goods in and out of Australia. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 28/2009 was introduced to address the problem of revoking tariff concessions when it is determined that such concessions are no longer necessary, particularly when domestic production of substitutable goods has commenced in Australia. This instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under the authority granted by sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, and 269SC of the Customs Act 1901. The policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are revoked when they are no longer justified, thereby maintaining a fair competitive environment for domestic producers. The instrument was published in the Gazette, as required by subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act, and it came into force on 28 September 2007, the date the request to revoke the tariff concession was lodged, in accordance with subsection 269SC(6).

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 28/2009, which revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0704649, applies to the specific context of tariff concessions under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument is pertinent to any entities or individuals affected by the customs duty rates on goods covered under TCO 0704649, which pertain to cooling tower packings. The revocation of this order impacts those who were previously benefiting from the lower customs duty rates on these goods, and it applies to the entire Commonwealth of Australia. The revocation is effective as of 1 August 2007, the date from which the order's provisions were nullified, and was made under the authority granted by sections 269C, 269P, and 269SB of the Customs Act 1901. The instrument reflects the process whereby the Chief Executive Officer of Customs must revoke a TCO if satisfied that the requesting party is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the TCO would not have been made if the request had been lodged on the original application date. This revocation does not extend to any other TCOs or goods outside the scope of TCO 0704649.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 28/2009 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269SB) outlines the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0704649, which pertains to cooling tower packings. This instrument was made in response to a request from Rhine Ruhr Pty Ltd, asserting that they are a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the presence of TCO 0704649 has negatively impacted their production capabilities. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) has determined that the conditions for revocation have been met, leading to the cancellation of the tariff concession (section 269SC). The Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO when considering a request for revocation of a TCO (section 269SC(1)). The CEO must ensure that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that if the TCO were not in force, it would not have been issued. This involves a detailed evaluation to confirm the applicant's status as a producer and the impact of the TCO on local production. Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving the request, detailing the request and the specifics of the TCO in question (subsection 269SC(1A)). This transparency measure ensures that all stakeholders are informed of the proceedings. In terms of consequences for non-compliance, while the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breach, it does state that the revocation of a TCO can have significant implications for the importers and beneficiaries of the original tariff concession. The revocation effectively removes the preferential duty rate for the specified goods, potentially increasing the cost of imported goods and impacting market dynamics. The legal and economic consequences for entities relying on the tariff concession can be substantial, as they must now navigate the increased duties on their imports. The revocation date is set to 1 August 2007, underscoring the importance of compliance with the provisions set out in the Customs Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
International Trade Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Repeal & Amendment

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.