Tariff Concession Revocation Order 27/2011

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L02366 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2011

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0824041 which covers gas turbine air intake pulse-jet filter parts.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2011 was made on 15 February 2010. It revokes TCO 0824041 as the CEO is satisfied that Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.27/2011, TCO 0824041, was revoked on 15 February 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 17 December 2009.

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2011 is an instrument under the Customs Act 1901, enacted to address the issue of tariff concessions on imported goods when domestic production of substitutable goods is established. The Customs Act 1901, managed by the Australian Parliament, provides for the imposition of lower customs duty rates on certain imported goods through Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. However, when a domestic producer claims that substitutable goods are now being produced, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs is mandated to revoke the TCO if satisfied that the domestic production meets the criteria for substitution and that the TCO would not have been granted had the current production status been known at the time of the TCO application. The revocation instrument was issued in response to a request by Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd, who demonstrated that they had become a producer of substitutable goods, thereby justifying the revocation of TCO 0824041 which covered gas turbine air intake pulse-jet filter parts.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2011 revokes TCO 0824041 under the Customs Act 1901. The instrument applies to the specific TCO 0824041 which provided tariff concessions on gas turbine air intake pulse-jet filter parts. The revocation applies to the extent that Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia of goods substitutable to those covered by the TCO, requested its revocation, and the CEO of Customs is satisfied that the conditions for revocation are met as per the core criteria. This revocation has a national jurisdictional reach across Australia, aligning with the overarching Customs Act 1901. The revocation is effective from the date of the request for revocation, 17 December 2009, despite provisions in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 that generally prohibit retrospective legislative instruments. The CEO was required to publish a notice of the request and revocation details in a Gazette as soon as practicable, ensuring transparency in the revocation process.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2011, which revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0824041, contains several key provisions that govern the process of tariff concessions and their revocation under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269C, 269P, 269SB, 269SC, 269SC(1A), 269SC(3), 269SC(6), 239SD(8)). The main provision of the Instrument is the revocation of TCO 0824041, which was made on 15 February 2011 and took effect from 17 December 2009. TCOs are orders that allow for a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods. The revocation of TCO 0824041 means that the higher rate of customs duty will now apply to gas turbine air intake pulse-jet filter parts. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, under section 269SB, a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke the TCO. The CEO is then required under section 269SC to make an order revoking the TCO if satisfied that the requestor is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the request had been made on the day the original TCO application was lodged. Furthermore, under section 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, including the full particulars of the TCO in question. The Instrument also outlines the consequences of breaching the provisions of the Customs Act 1901. While the Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with the revocation process, any breach of its provisions may result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, under section 269R, a person who makes a false or misleading statement in an application for a TCO may be subject to a penalty of up to five years imprisonment or a fine of up to 5,000 penalty units, or both. Additionally, any person who contravenes a provision of the Act may be liable to pay a pecuniary penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units for a corporation and 2,000 penalty units for an individual, as per section 272 of the Act. These penalties serve as a deterrent against non-compliance and ensure adherence to the legal requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.