Tariff Concession Revocation Order 27/2007

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2007L00458 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2007

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO  8635640 which covers tyre cordage.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2007 was made on 24 January 2007. It revokes TCO  8635640 as the CEO is satisfied that Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.27/2007 revoked 8635640 on 24 January 2007.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the administration of customs duties and includes provisions for the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders, which are issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, provide reduced customs duty rates for specific goods if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2007, made on 24 January 2007, revokes TCO 8635640 for tyre cordage in response to a request from Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd. This revocation was authorised because the CEO is satisfied that Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd is now producing substitutable goods in Australia, fulfilling the criteria for revocation under the Act. This revocation reflects the policy objective to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted where they remain justified by the absence of Australian production of substitutable goods.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2007, made under the Customs Act 1901, pertains specifically to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 8635640 which previously provided a lower rate of customs duty on tyre cordage. The Act applies to any party requesting the revocation of a TCO and includes entities such as Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd, which, in this case, claimed to be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. The CEO of Customs, as the authority responsible for managing TCOs, plays a pivotal role in the application of this Act. The Instrument revokes TCO 8635640 based on the CEO’s satisfaction that Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd is indeed a producer of substitutable goods, and that the TCO would not have been issued if the current circumstances had existed at the time of the initial application. The revocation of the TCO takes immediate effect on the day the request was lodged, as per the Act’s provisions, notwithstanding any prohibitions against retrospective legislative instruments.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2007 involve the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 8635640, which pertains to tyre cordage (sections 269SB, 269SC(1) and (3), and 269SD). This revocation occurs due to the CEO's satisfaction that Bekaert Australia Steel Cord Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods, and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the request to revoke it was made on the day the original application for the TCO was lodged (subsection 269SC(1)). Section 269SB allows a producer of substitutable goods to request the CEO to revoke a TCO, while sections 269SC and 269SD outline the conditions under which the CEO must make such an order and the timing of its effect. The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties it governs. For instance, it requires the CEO to satisfy certain conditions before revoking a TCO, including verifying that the requesting party is indeed a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the revocation request was made on the day the original TCO application was lodged. Additionally, subsection 269SC(1A) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation, detailing the request and the full particulars of the TCO in question. These obligations ensure transparency and due process in the revocation of TCOs. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901, particularly in the context of the revocation of TCOs, could result in various consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Act could potentially lead to civil or criminal liabilities. The severity of these consequences would depend on the nature and extent of the breach, and they could include fines or other penalties as prescribed by the relevant legislation. The Act's provisions are designed to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme and ensure that any revocations are justified and properly executed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.