EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2005
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(2) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that, in making a TCO, there has been a transcription error in the description of goods the subject of the TCO including the tariff classification that is stated in the TCO to apply to the goods, the CEO may:
− make an order revoking the TCO; and
− make a new TCO in respect of goods that corrects the error.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2005 was made on 23 November 2005. It revokes TCO 0510288 and makes TCO 0514857 because of a certain transcription error.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken since the change is minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(3) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day on which the TCO came into force and the new TCO has effect from the revocation of the old TCO.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.27/2005 revoked 0510288 and made new TCO 0514857 on 23 November 2005.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2005, enacted in 2005, addresses a specific issue related to the Customs Act 1901, specifically the need to correct transcription errors in Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duty on imported goods, and Part XVA of the Act allows for the establishment and revocation of TCOs by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The objective of this legislation is to ensure the accuracy of the descriptions and tariff classifications of goods subject to TCOs, thereby maintaining the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2005 revokes an existing TCO due to a transcription error and establishes a new TCO to correct the error, reflecting the policy objective of ensuring that TCOs accurately reflect the goods they pertain to.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 27/2005 applies to the revocation and issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. It is directed at the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who is responsible for making and revoking these orders. The Act applies to goods subject to these orders, with a specific focus on correcting transcription errors that may have occurred in the description of goods or their tariff classifications. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under the federal Customs Act 1901, impacting customs duty rates across Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the scope of this specific instrument, though the overarching Customs Act may contain other provisions that could apply to different circumstances. The instrument extends the application of the Act by revoking and reissuing a TCO to correct an error, illustrating how the Act can be amended through subordinate instruments to address specific issues as they arise.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2005, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, primarily addresses the revocation and replacement of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) due to transcription errors. Section 269C and 269P of the Act establish the criteria for making TCOs, which apply lower rates of customs duty on specific goods. Under subsection 269SD(2) of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is empowered to revoke a TCO and issue a new one if there is a transcription error in the description of the goods or their tariff classification. This instrument, specifically, revokes TCO 0510288 and replaces it with TCO 0514857, correcting the aforementioned error.
The Act imposes certain obligations on the CEO and other entities involved in the administration of TCOs. The CEO must ensure that any TCOs made are accurate and correctly describe the goods subject to tariff concessions. When an error is identified, the CEO is required to promptly revoke the erroneous TCO and issue a corrected one. The new TCO must accurately reflect the correct tariff classification and description of the goods to avoid further discrepancies. This process ensures the integrity and effectiveness of the tariff concession scheme.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and the associated instruments can lead to civil and criminal consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in this explanatory statement, breaches of the Act can generally result in fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The penalties for non-compliance are determined by the nature and severity of the breach, with maximum penalties provided by other sections of the Act. It is essential for all parties to adhere strictly to the requirements of the Act to avoid any legal repercussions.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 27/2005 came into effect on the day it was made, 23 November 2005, with the revocation of TCO 0510288 and the issuance of TCO 0514857. The instrument's effectiveness is governed by subsection 269SD(3), which states that the revocation takes effect from the original TCO's commencement date, and the new TCO takes effect from the moment of the old TCO's revocation. Furthermore, subsection 269SD(6) ensures that this process is valid despite the prohibitions outlined in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally restricts retrospective legislative instruments. This legal framework ensures that the necessary corrections are made without legal impediments.