EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 26/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0807267 which covers power station gas turbine exhaust stacks.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 26/2011 was made on 5 February 2010. It revokes TCO 0807267 as the CEO is satisfied that Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.26/2011, TCO 0807267, was revoked on 5 February 2010 with the Revocation date of effect as from 17 December 2009.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 26/2011 is an instrument made under the Customs Act 1901 to address a specific issue related to tariff concessions for goods imported into Australia. Enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, the instrument revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0807267, which had been applied to power station gas turbine exhaust stacks. This revocation followed a request by Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd, a local producer that claimed to manufacture substitutable goods. The revocation was based on the CEO’s satisfaction that the company qualified as a producer of substitutable goods and that, had the TCO not been in force, it would not have been granted. The objective of the instrument aligns with the policy of ensuring fair trade practices by preventing tariff concessions where local production of substitutable goods exists.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as amended, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and the regulation of imports and exports in Australia. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make and revoke Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which apply lower rates of customs duty to certain goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 26/2011 revokes TCO 0807267, which had provided concessions for power station gas turbine exhaust stacks, following a request by Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd. The revocation is applicable from 17 December 2009, the date on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, and is effective from the date of the Instrument's making, 5 February 2010. This revocation is subject to the CEO being satisfied that the applicant is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the concession would not have been granted had the application been made on the revocation date. The Act mandates that the CEO must publish a notice of the revocation request in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receipt of the request, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the changes to the tariff concessions. The scope of this Instrument is confined to the revocation of the specific TCO in question and does not extend to other TCOs or alterations in the broader customs legislation.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 26/2011 under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0807267, which had previously reduced customs duty rates on power station gas turbine exhaust stacks. This revocation was executed following a request from Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd, asserting their status as a producer of substitutable goods in Australia (sections 269C, 269P, and 269SB). The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) revoked the TCO after being satisfied that Baltec was indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the current conditions were to apply as of the date the original TCO application was lodged (subsections 269SC(1) and (3)).
Entities governed by the Customs Act 1901, including producers of goods subject to customs duties, have specific obligations. Producers of substitutable goods, such as Baltec Inlet and Exhaust Systems Pty Ltd, have the right to request the revocation of a TCO if they believe it no longer meets the criteria for concession. Upon receiving such a request, the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette, detailing the request and the particulars of the TCO in question (subsection 269SC(1A)). Additionally, the CEO must promptly review the request and make a decision based on the criteria specified in the Act, ensuring that the decision-making process is transparent and accessible to all parties involved.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches related to the revocation of TCOs. However, any general breaches of the Customs Act 1901 could potentially result in civil or criminal consequences. For instance, providing false information in an application or request could lead to fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. It is important for entities to comply with the Act's provisions and to provide accurate information to avoid any potential legal repercussions. The revocation of TCO 0807267 on 5 February 2010, effective from 17 December 2009, demonstrates the Act's mechanism for adjusting tariff concessions in response to changes in the production landscape within Australia (subsections 269SC(6) and 269SD(8)).