EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 25/2009
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0700608 which covers mono compressor chillers.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 25/2009 was made on 6 February 2009. It revokes TCO 0700608 as the CEO is satisfied that Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.25/2009, TCO 0700608, was revoked on 6 February 2009 with the Revocation date of effect as from 9 December 2008.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be created and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This act was designed to address the gap in ensuring that tariff concessions are appropriately applied to goods that do not have local substitutes. In this context, TCOs provide lower rates of customs duty for goods where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 25/2009 was introduced to revoke TCO 0700608, which relates to mono compressor chillers, in response to a request by Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods. The revocation was made effective from 9 December 2008, following the CEO's satisfaction that the conditions for revocation were met, and the policy objective of ensuring fair competition and local production was upheld.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 25/2009 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0700608 which pertains to mono compressor chillers. The instrument is made under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, specifically sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD, and it affects entities or individuals involved in the production of substitutable goods in Australia. The instrument revokes the tariff concession that had been granted to the specified goods, as a result of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs being satisfied that Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable to the goods covered by TCO 0700608, and that the concession would not have been granted if the current circumstances were the same as when the order was originally made. The revocation is effective from 9 December 2008, the date on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it applies to goods produced within Australia and governed under Commonwealth legislation. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the instrument itself, but the Act's application may be further defined through subordinate instruments or regulations.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 25/2009 (Instrument) revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0700608, which covered mono compressor chillers, as requested by Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd. This revocation took effect on 9 December 2008, the date the request was lodged. The Instrument was made under the Customs Act 1901, specifically under sections 269C, 269P, and 269SB. Section 269C allows for the making of a TCO if certain criteria are met, while section 269P specifies that a TCO applies a lower rate of customs duty to goods covered by the order. Section 269SB allows a producer of substitutable goods to request the revocation of a TCO. The CEO of Customs must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requesting producer is indeed producing substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the producer were in operation at the time the original application for the TCO was lodged.
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on the parties governed by the Instrument include the requirement for Boronia Technologies Pty Ltd to demonstrate that they are a producer of substitutable goods for the mono compressor chillers covered by TCO 0700608. The CEO of Customs must then evaluate the request and, if satisfied with the evidence provided, proceed to revoke the TCO. Additionally, the CEO is mandated to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving the request for revocation. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO in question. The revocation order itself comes into force on the day the request is lodged, despite any prohibitions under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 on retrospective legislative instruments.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 25/2009 itself does not specify any penalties or criminal or civil consequences for breach of its provisions. However, any failure to comply with the obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901, such as providing false information in a request for revocation, could lead to legal action. Such actions could result in penalties under other relevant provisions of the Customs Act 1901 or other applicable legislation. For instance, knowingly providing false or misleading information could be considered an offence under section 231 of the Customs Act 1901, which could result in fines and imprisonment. Similarly, any failure to publish the required notice in the Gazette could be seen as a non-compliance with statutory obligations, potentially leading to administrative penalties or legal challenges.