EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 24/2008
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0614221 which covers tubes.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 24/2008 was made on 5 November 2007. It revokes TCO 0614221 as the CEO is satisfied that Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.24/2008, TCO 0614221, was revoked on 5 November 2007 with the Revocation date of effect as from 7 September 2007.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the administration of customs and excise, including the imposition and collection of duties, the regulation of imports and exports, and the protection of revenue. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 24/2008 addresses the specific issue of revoking tariff concessions that may no longer be justified due to changes in the production landscape in Australia. This instrument was developed in response to a request by Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia, for the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0614221, which covers tubes. The revocation was made under the authority granted by sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901, and was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who was satisfied that the conditions for revocation were met. The policy objective of this revocation aligns with ensuring that tariff concessions are only granted when there are no substitutable goods produced in Australia, thus maintaining a fair and competitive market. The enactment of this instrument was carried out by the relevant authority in accordance with the legislative requirements, ensuring that the revocation process was both transparent and legally sound.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 24/2008, issued under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0614221, which concerns tubes. The Act applies to any entity that engages in the importation of goods subject to TCOs, particularly those that might be considered substitutable by domestic producers. The CEO of Customs has the authority to make and revoke TCOs, and these orders are designed to lower the customs duty rate for specific goods, provided that no equivalent goods are being produced domestically on the day the TCO application is made. The revocation process is initiated by a request from a producer of substitutable goods, and if the CEO determines that the conditions for revocation are met, the TCO is revoked. The revocation takes effect from the date the revocation request was lodged, thereby adhering to the requirements of the Customs Act 1901 and ensuring compliance with the legislative instruments. This revocation is a specific application of the broader scheme outlined in Part XVA of the Act, illustrating the dynamic nature of tariff concessions in response to changes in domestic production.
Key Provisions
The main provisions of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 24/2008 (F2008L00272) revolve around the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0614221, which pertains to tubes. According to the Customs Act 1901, section 269SB allows for the revocation of a TCO if a producer of substitutable goods in Australia requests it. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must consider this request and make a decision based on whether the TCO would have been issued if the application for it were lodged on the day the revocation request was made, as stipulated in sections 269SC(1) and (3). Following this, Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 24/2008 was issued on 5 November 2007, revoking TCO 0614221 due to the CEO's satisfaction that Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made.
The obligations under this Instrument primarily rest on Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd, who made the request for revocation. The CEO of Customs is required to assess the request against the core criteria outlined in the Customs Act 1901. This involves confirming that Onesteel Trading Pty Ltd is indeed a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and determining if the CEO would have approved the TCO if the application had been made on the day the revocation request was lodged. Furthermore, the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving the revocation request, in compliance with subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
In terms of breaches and consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for failing to comply with the provisions of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 24/2008. However, any actions taken by the CEO in making or revoking a TCO are governed by the general legal framework provided by the Customs Act 1901. Violation of any customs-related provisions can lead to penalties under the Customs Act 1901, which can include fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the specific nature and severity of the breach, as well as any additional legislative provisions that may apply.