EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 22/2008
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Longreach Telescopic Conveyors Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0710122 which covers telescopic conveyors.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 22/2008 was made on 23 January 2008. It revokes TCO 0710122 as the CEO is satisfied that Longreach Telescopic Conveyors Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.22/2008, TCO 0710122, was revoked on 23 January 2008 with the Revocation date of effect as from 20 November 2007.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the regulation of customs and excise in Australia. It includes provisions for the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which grant preferential tariff rates on certain imported goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 22/2008 was introduced to address the issue of revoking a TCO when a local producer emerges or when the conditions that justified the concession no longer apply. This instrument, which was made on 23 January 2008, revokes TCO 0710122 at the request of Longreach Telescopic Conveyors Pty Ltd, who claimed to be a producer of substitutable goods. The policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are granted only when necessary to protect Australian industries from unfair competition, and to promptly revoke such concessions when they are no longer justified.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, facilitates the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to lower the rate of customs duty on certain goods. These orders apply to goods specified in the TCO, provided that on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia. A person who claims to be a producer of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO if they believe the concession is unwarranted. The CEO must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requestor is indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued had it been the day of the original application. This legislation applies to any person or entity that engages in the production of goods in Australia and seeks to challenge the application of tariff concessions on competing imported goods. The scope of this Act is national, applying across Australia, and is enforced under federal law. There are no specific exclusions or exemptions outlined in this context, although the Act's provisions can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which are subject to the legislative requirements and processes.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 22/2008, under the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0710122 concerning telescopic conveyors. This revocation was executed in accordance with sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Act, which provide the framework for revoking TCOs when certain conditions are met. Specifically, section 269SC(1) mandates that the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs must revoke a TCO if they are satisfied that a producer in Australia has started manufacturing substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued if the application had been made on the day the revocation request was lodged.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are detailed and structured. The CEO of Customs is required to conduct a thorough review upon receiving a request for revocation of a TCO. This involves verifying whether the applicant is indeed a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and whether the TCO would have been issued under current conditions. Furthermore, under section 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, detailing the request and the specifics of the TCO in question. This transparency measure ensures that all stakeholders are informed about the revocation process.
In terms of consequences, breaches of the conditions set forth in the Customs Act 1901 may result in significant civil or criminal penalties. While the specific penalties are not detailed in this Instrument, it is understood that the Act encompasses a range of penalties for non-compliance, which can include fines and, in more severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in other sections of the Customs Act and relevant legislation. The revocation of a TCO, as in this case, is a direct consequence of satisfying the conditions set out in the Act, reflecting the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements.