Tariff Concession Revocation Order 204/2011

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2012L00104 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 204/2011

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Enerka Apex Belting Pty Limited requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0615398 which covers conveyor belts.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 204/2011 was made on 4 July 2011. It revokes TCO 0615398 as the CEO is satisfied that Enerka Apex Belting Pty Limited is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 204/2011, TCO 0615398, was revoked on 4 July 2011 with the Revocation date of effect as from 12 May 2011.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the imposition and remission of customs duties, including the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 204/2011 was introduced to address the specific issue of revoking a TCO when a producer in Australia can demonstrate the availability of substitutable goods. This legislation allows for the revocation of a TCO if it is established that the original conditions for its imposition no longer hold true, thus ensuring the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. The policy objective of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument is to maintain fairness in the application of customs duties by ensuring that tariff concessions are only granted when genuinely necessary and justified by the absence of local production of substitutable goods.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 204/2011 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0615398, which relates to conveyor belts. This instrument operates under the Customs Act 1901, specifically targeting the revocation process of tariff concessions granted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act applies to any person or entity seeking to revoke a TCO on the basis that substitutable goods are now being produced in Australia, thereby meeting the criteria for revocation as outlined in the Act. The revocation process is triggered when a producer in Australia, such as Enerka Apex Belting Pty Limited, requests the revocation of a TCO under section 269SB of the Act. The geographic reach of this instrument is national, as it pertains to the federal customs regulations governed by the Commonwealth. The instrument revokes the tariff concessions for conveyor belts, effective from the date the request was lodged, 12 May 2011, despite the prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 204/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0615398. Section 269SB of the Act allows a producer of substitutable goods to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO if they believe that the goods covered by the TCO are now being produced in Australia. Section 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act stipulates that the CEO must revoke the TCO if they are satisfied that the applicant is indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the request to revoke it was lodged on the same day as the original application for the TCO. In this case, Enerka Apex Belting Pty Limited requested the revocation of TCO 0615398, which pertains to conveyor belts, and the CEO found that the conditions for revocation were met. The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties involved. As per subsection 269SC(1A), the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for the revocation of a TCO. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and provide full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates. Additionally, the revocation of a TCO comes into effect on the day the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, as outlined in subsection 269SC(6). The revocation is effective despite any prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments, as per subsection 269SD(8) of the Act. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the Explanatory Statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach of the Act, it is worth noting that the Act provides for various penalties for breaches of customs laws. For example, section 245 of the Act imposes penalties for smuggling, including fines and imprisonment. In cases where the amount of duty or tax evaded is significant, the penalties can be severe, with maximum fines and imprisonment terms outlined in the Act. The precise penalties and consequences for a breach will depend on the nature and severity of the offence.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Civil Penalty Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.