EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 2/2009
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Denyers International requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0606366 which covers operating tables.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 2/2009 was made on 25 July 2008. It revokes TCO 0606366 as the CEO is satisfied that Denyers International is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.2/2009, TCO 0606366, was revoked on 25 July 2008 with the Revocation date of effect as from 29 February 2008.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the application and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) aimed at facilitating trade by reducing customs duty on certain imported goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 2/2009 addresses the problem of ensuring that tariff concessions are not granted when substitutable goods are produced domestically. This instrument revokes TCO 0606366 for operating tables following a request from Denyers International, a domestic producer of substitutable goods. The revocation is based on the Chief Executive Officer of Customs being satisfied that Denyers International is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued if the current circumstances were those at the time of the original application. The process also includes mandatory public notification upon receipt of a revocation request, thereby ensuring transparency and allowing for stakeholder input before the revocation takes effect.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 2/2009 applies to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) made under the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, it concerns the revocation of TCO 0606366 which covers operating tables, as requested by Denyers International. The Act allows for the revocation of a TCO if the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that a producer in Australia is now producing goods that are substitutable to those covered by the TCO and that the TCO would not have been made if the application was lodged on the day the revocation request was made. This process ensures that tariff concessions are not granted where local production of substitutable goods exists, thereby protecting Australian producers from unfair competition. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this Act is national, applying across Australia as it pertains to the federal customs regime. There are no specific exclusions mentioned in the explanatory statement, but it is implicitly understood that the revocation applies only to TCOs that meet the specified criteria. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments such as the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument, which provides the formal means to revoke a TCO under the specified conditions.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 2/2009 (the Instrument) are sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901. These sections allow for the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Section 269C outlines the process for creating a TCO, whereby a lower rate of customs duty applies to goods if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. Section 269P details the conditions under which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) must make a TCO. Section 269SB provides a mechanism for requesting the revocation of a TCO, while sections 269SC and 269SD lay out the conditions and process for revoking a TCO, including the requirement for the CEO to be satisfied that a producer of substitutable goods exists and that the TCO would not have been made if the TCO were not in force.
The Instrument imposes specific obligations on the CEO in relation to the revocation of TCOs. Under section 269SC(1) of the Act, the CEO is required to make an order revoking a TCO if certain conditions are met. Specifically, the CEO must be satisfied that the person requesting the revocation is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable to the goods covered by the TCO, and that if the TCO were not in force, the CEO would not have made the TCO on the day the application was originally lodged. Furthermore, section 269SC(1A) mandates that the CEO publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation, detailing the request and the particulars of the TCO. The CEO must also ensure that the revocation order takes effect from the day the revocation request was lodged, as stipulated in section 269SD(8).
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901, including the conditions for making or revoking a TCO, could result in various consequences. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly mention specific offences or penalties for non-compliance with the Act, breaches of customs laws can generally lead to civil or criminal penalties. These may include fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The exact penalties would be determined by the applicable provisions of the Customs Act and any other relevant legislation.