EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 194/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 194/2011 was made on 29 July 2011. It revokes TCO 0811643 as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 194/2011 revoked TCO 0811643 on 27 July 2011.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 194/2011, enacted on 29 July 2011, addresses the issue of unused tariff concession orders under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument revokes Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0811643, as the Chief Executive Officer of Customs determined that the TCO had not been quoted in any import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty for two years prior to the revocation. The Customs Act 1901 allows the CEO to revoke a TCO if it is no longer required, as stipulated in section 269SD(1A). The revocation does not require consultation and is effective from the date the CEO became satisfied that the TCO had not been used, as specified in subsection 269SD(1A). This legislative instrument was enacted by the relevant authority to ensure that tariff concessions are applied appropriately and efficiently, reflecting current trade practices and needs.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 194/2011 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). Specifically, this instrument revokes TCO 0811643 as the CEO determined that it had not been used to secure a concessional rate of duty in any import entry for the preceding two years. This instrument operates within the framework established by sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD(1A) of the Customs Act 1901, which allows for the making and revoking of TCOs based on the production of goods in Australia and the usage of the concessions in import entries. The revocation of TCO 0811643 is effective from the day the CEO became satisfied that it had not been used in the specified period, as provided by subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act. It should be noted that the revocation does not require consultation as it does not affect any business operations due to the inactivity of the TCO over the stated period. The instrument's commencement is governed by subsection 269SD(6), which ensures that the revocation takes effect despite the prohibitions under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 concerning retrospective legislative instruments.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 194/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, primarily operates to revoke Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0811643, which had been in place to allow a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods. This revocation is pursuant to section 269SD(1A) of the Act, which permits the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke a TCO if it has not been used to secure a concessional rate of duty in any import entry for the two years preceding the decision to revoke. In this instance, the CEO revoked TCO 0811643 because it had not been quoted in an import entry in the two years leading up to the decision. The revocation took effect from the day the CEO became satisfied that the TCO was no longer required.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who must ensure that TCOs are only in effect if they are necessary and actively being used. The CEO must monitor the use of TCOs and, if a TCO has not been quoted in an import entry for two consecutive years, must take action to revoke it. This ensures that the concessions are being applied appropriately and are serving their intended purpose of facilitating trade without unduly burdening domestic producers.
Under the Customs Act 1901, failure to adhere to the provisions regarding the revocation of TCOs can lead to civil and criminal consequences. However, the specific nature and penalties for such breaches are not detailed within this particular revocation instrument. Generally, breaches of the Customs Act can result in penalties, including fines and potential imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. The exact penalties would be determined by the courts, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 194/2011, by revoking TCO 0811643, highlights the importance of ensuring that tariff concessions are effectively utilized. The revocation is effective from the day the CEO determined the TCO was no longer needed, ensuring that any administrative changes are implemented promptly. Despite the revocation, no consultation was deemed necessary as the TCO had not been used in the preceding two years, thereby not impacting any businesses. The revocation also operates despite any conflicting provisions in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, ensuring that the Customs Act provisions are given precedence in this specific context.