EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 193/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011 was made on 29 July 2011. It revokes TCO 0808975 as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011 revoked TCO 0808975 on 27 July 2011.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011 is an instrument made under the Customs Act 1901, aimed at revoking a specific Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that had not been used for two consecutive years. This instrument was introduced to streamline the customs duty process by ensuring that tariff concessions are only in place for goods that are actually being imported under these concessions. Enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, the revocation of TCO 0808975 aligns with the statutory provision that allows for the revocation of unused TCOs to maintain efficiency and relevance in the tariff concession scheme. The policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are effectively utilised, thereby preventing unnecessary administrative burdens and potential economic distortions that could arise from unused concessions.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011 pertains to the Customs Act 1901 and specifically addresses the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) under the Act's provisions. This legislation applies to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who is authorised to revoke a TCO if satisfied that it has not been used for a concessional rate of duty in the two years preceding the determination. The revocation of a TCO, in this case TCO 0808975, is executed in accordance with the authority granted under the Act and takes effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied with the specified conditions. The instrument has a national reach within the Commonwealth of Australia and impacts on entities and persons involved in importing goods subject to the revoked TCO. Notably, no consultation was undertaken for this revocation, as the inactivity of the TCO over the specified period ensures it has no current effect on business operations. The revocation is effective despite provisions in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 that typically prohibit retrospective legislative instruments, underscoring the specific legislative intent and authority underpinning this instrument.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation, the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011, are sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901. Section 269C allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under specific conditions, while section 269P outlines the criteria for these orders to be effective. Section 269SD(1A) empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO if it has not been utilised in the preceding two years. This particular instrument revokes TCO 0808975 based on the CEO's satisfaction that it has not been used for the specified period.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, it requires the CEO to ensure that a TCO is only made if the application meets the core criteria, specifically if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. Additionally, the CEO must monitor the usage of TCOs and be prepared to revoke them if they are not used within the specified timeframe. The CEO’s role is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the tariff concession scheme by ensuring that only appropriate and necessary concessions are in place.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the misuse or non-utilisation of TCOs, can lead to significant consequences. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences or penalties, breaches of the Act can generally result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, incorrect claims for tariff concessions could lead to financial penalties, while more serious breaches might result in criminal charges. The maximum penalties for breaches would typically be determined by the specific provisions of the Customs Act and could include fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 193/2011 revokes TCO 0808975 from 27 July 2011, the day the CEO became satisfied that the TCO had not been used in the preceding two years. This revocation is effective under section 269SD(1A) of the Customs Act, and it is important to note that this section operates despite the prohibitions under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally prevents the making of retrospective legislative instruments. This ensures that the CEO’s actions in revoking the TCO are legally valid and enforceable.