EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 192/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 192/2011 was made on 29 July 2011. It revokes TCO 0709012 as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 192/2011 revoked TCO 0709012 on 27 July 2011.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, established a framework within which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be created and revoked. These orders apply lower rates of customs duty to specific goods. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 192/2011, made under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, addresses the issue of unused or obsolete TCOs by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to revoke such orders if they have not been utilised in the two years prior to the determination. This legislative instrument was introduced to ensure that tariff concessions remain relevant and are only applied where there is actual benefit or need, thereby maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of the customs duty system.
The Instrument was enacted without consultation, as the unused TCO in question had no impact on business operations. The revocation of TCO 0709012, effective from 27 July 2011, aligns with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, which permit the revocation of TCOs under certain conditions, overriding the prohibition on retrospective legislative instruments as per section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act applies to any entities or individuals seeking to import goods into Australia, particularly those who may benefit from reduced customs duty rates as outlined in a TCO. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it applies throughout Australia. The Act allows for the revocation of TCOs if it is determined that the concessions are no longer required, such as when a TCO has not been used in the preceding two years. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 192/2011, made on 29 July 2011, revoked TCO 0709012 due to non-utilisation in the preceding two years. This revocation took effect from the day the CEO became satisfied that the TCO had not been used, demonstrating the Act's ability to extend its application through subordinate instruments. The revocation does not impact businesses as the TCO had not been used for two years, and no consultation was undertaken in this instance.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 192/2011 operates under sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD of the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, section 269SD(1A) allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) if it has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty for the two years preceding the day on which the CEO becomes satisfied of this fact. The instrument revokes TCO 0709012 under these provisions because it has not been used in the two years prior to the CEO's satisfaction on 27 July 2011. This revocation is effective from the same date (subsection 269SD(1A)).
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Firstly, the CEO must monitor the usage of TCOs to determine if they are still required. If a TCO is not quoted in an import entry for two consecutive years, the CEO must revoke it (subsection 269SD(1A)). Additionally, entities that rely on TCOs must ensure they are still in effect if they wish to benefit from the lower rates of customs duty. Failure to comply with the conditions of a TCO can result in the standard rate of duty being applied, rather than the concessional rate.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the revocation of a TCO, can lead to various penalties and consequences. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Act are outlined in section 283 and can include fines and imprisonment. For corporations, the maximum penalty for an offence under the Act is a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units, while for individuals, the maximum penalty can be a fine of up to 2,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both. Additionally, civil consequences can include the imposition of customs duties and charges at the standard rate rather than the concessional rate.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for the revocation of a TCO under section 269SD of the Act. However, the general provisions of the Act apply to ensure compliance. Subsection 269SD(6) specifies that the revocation takes effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally prohibits the making of retrospective legislative instruments. This ensures that the revocation of a TCO can be applied even if it has a retrospective effect.