EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 178/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Instrument No 178/2011 was made on 10 January 2011. It revokes the TCO’s stated in the instrument as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concession Revocation Instrument No.178/2011 revokes the TCO’s stated in the instrument with effect from 09 December 2010.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, establishes a framework for the imposition and administration of customs duty and provides for the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders allow for reduced customs duty rates on specified goods under certain conditions. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 178/2011, made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) on 10 January 2011, addresses the problem of unused tariff concessions by revoking TCOs that have not been utilised in the preceding two years. This revocation is in accordance with section 269SD(1A) of the Act, which empowers the CEO to revoke a TCO if it has not been used for duty concessions within the specified period. The instrument revokes the specified TCOs with effect from 9 December 2010, ensuring that the Act remains effective and relevant by removing outdated concessions that no longer serve their intended purpose.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 178/2011 is an instrument made under the Customs Act 1901, which outlines the procedures for making and revoking Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders, administered by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, provide for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods, contingent upon the absence of substitutable goods being produced in Australia at the time of the application. The instrument applies to the TCOs identified within it, revoking those that have not been utilized in the import entries to secure a concessional rate of duty over the preceding two years. This revocation is effective from 9 December 2010, the date on which the CEO determined that the TCOs were no longer required, despite the prohibitions against retrospective legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The revocation is not anticipated to impact businesses, as these particular TCOs had not been in use. The instrument’s scope is limited to the specified TCOs, and it does not extend to any other concessions or orders under the Customs Act 1901.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 178/2011 are found in the Customs Act 1901 (the Act). Specifically, section 269C allows for the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), while section 269P outlines the core criteria that must be met for such an order to be made. Section 269SD(1A) provides the authority for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to revoke a TCO if it has not been used in the preceding two years. This revocation takes effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the specified period.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties and entities it governs. Firstly, the CEO must ensure that any TCO made under the Act meets the core criteria, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged (section 269C). Additionally, the CEO must monitor the usage of TCOs to determine if they are still required. If a TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty in the two years preceding the day the CEO becomes satisfied of this fact, the CEO is required to revoke the TCO (section 269SD(1A)). These provisions ensure that tariff concessions are only granted when necessary and are revoked when they are no longer needed.
The Act also includes provisions for the revocation of TCOs. Section 269SD(6) specifies that the revocation of a TCO takes effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding two years, despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally prohibits the making of retrospective legislative instruments. This ensures that the revocation process can be carried out efficiently and without undue delay. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.178/2011 revokes the TCOs stated in the instrument with effect from 09 December 2010, reflecting the CEO's satisfaction that these TCOs had not been used in the required period.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Customs Act 1901 does not specify maximum penalties for the failure to comply with the provisions regarding TCOs. However, the Act does provide for general penalties for breaches of customs regulations, which can include fines and imprisonment. For example, section 224 of the Act imposes penalties for fraud and other serious breaches of customs law, with maximum penalties varying depending on the nature and severity of the offence. It is important for parties and entities governed by the Act to adhere to the requirements and obligations outlined in the legislation to avoid potential penalties and legal consequences.