Tariff Concession Revocation Order 17/2011

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L01165 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 17/2011

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Huntsman Corporation Australia Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0703307 which covers monobutyl ethylene glycol ethers.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 17/2011 was made on 20 August 2009. It revokes TCO 0703307 as the CEO is satisfied that Huntsman Corporation Australia Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.17/2011, TCO 0703307, was revoked on 20 August 2009 with the Revocation date of effect as from 29 June 2009.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties in Australia. One of its mechanisms is the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which grant lower customs duty rates on specified goods, contingent upon the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 17/2011 was introduced to address the issue of revoking a TCO when a producer in Australia claims that they can manufacture the goods covered by the concession, thereby making the concession unnecessary. This instrument was developed to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted when genuinely needed, preventing unwarranted reductions in customs duties. The objective of this revocation, as stated in the explanatory statement, is to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme by ensuring that concessions are not in place when local production is feasible.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 17/2011, operating under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) which provide lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. The Act applies to entities or individuals seeking to revoke a TCO based on the production of substitutable goods in Australia. The scope of the Act extends to the revocation process overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who is mandated to revoke a TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the application was lodged on the day of the revocation request. The revocation applies nationally and is not limited to specific states or territories within Australia. There are no stated exclusions or thresholds in the Act itself, but the specifics of revocation hinge on the criteria set forth in the Customs Act 1901. The Act's application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may further define or refine the conditions under which a TCO can be revoked.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically sections 269C, 269P, and 269SB of the Customs Act 1901, outline the process for making and revoking Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). According to section 269C, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, including the condition that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. Section 269P provides that a lower rate of customs duty applies to goods subject to a TCO. Section 269SB allows a person claiming to be a producer of substitutable goods in Australia to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on the parties and entities it governs include the necessity for the CEO to revoke a TCO if they are satisfied that the requesting party is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made had it been lodged on the day the revocation request was made. This obligation is detailed under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act. Furthermore, the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation, as stipulated in subsection 269SC(1A). This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates. Offences, penalties, or consequences for breach of the provisions in the Customs Act 1901 are not explicitly detailed in the explanatory statement provided. However, it is understood that the revocation of a TCO has significant implications, particularly for those who benefit from the lower customs duty rates under the TCO. The revocation of TCO 0703307, as noted in Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 17/2011, means that the higher rate of customs duty would apply to monobutyl ethylene glycol ethers from the date of the revocation request, 29 June 2009. This could affect the competitiveness and pricing of the affected goods in the Australian market.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs & International Trade Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.