EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 158/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 158/2011 was made on 18 August 2011. It revokes TCO 0618605 as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 158/2011 revoked TCO 0618605 on 18 August 2011.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 158/2011, enacted on 18 August 2011, serves to address the issue of unused tariff concession orders (TCOs) within the framework of the Customs Act 1901. This instrument was introduced to ensure that tariff concessions are only applicable to goods that genuinely require them and to maintain the efficiency and relevance of the customs duty system. The revocation of TCO 0618605 under this instrument was carried out by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, following the satisfaction that the specific concession had not been utilised in the preceding two years, thereby adhering to the provisions set out in sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD(1A) of the Act. The instrument was made without consultation as its impact on businesses is deemed negligible given the inactivity of the concession in question. The revocation is effective from the day the CEO determined the inactivity of the TCO, and it operates in accordance with the legislative provisions despite the prohibitions outlined in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 158/2011 operates under the framework established by Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901, which allows for the creation and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders, when in effect, provide a lower rate of customs duty for specified goods. The revocation of a TCO, such as TCO 0618605, occurs when the CEO determines that the order has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty for a continuous period of two years. The revocation applies to the specific TCO and the goods it pertains to, and its effect is immediate upon the CEO's satisfaction of the non-utilisation condition. This instrument is effective throughout Australia, aligning with the national scope of the Customs Act 1901, and it does not apply to any other TCOs or goods unless similarly assessed and revoked. The instrument's operation does not involve any consultation processes as it pertains to an unused TCO, thereby having no impact on business activities. The revocation is enacted under the authority granted by the Customs Act, and the instrument's effect is not constrained by retrospective legislative prohibitions as stipulated in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 158/2011 concern the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, section 269SD(1A) allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to revoke a TCO if they are satisfied that the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty in the two years preceding that day. This instrument revokes TCO 0618605 because the CEO is satisfied that it has not been used in the preceding two years, as per section 269SD(1A). The revocation of the TCO is effective from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding two years, as outlined in section 269SD(6).
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Firstly, the CEO must ensure that a TCO is revoked if it has not been used in securing a concessional rate of duty for two consecutive years. This is a critical requirement to maintain the efficiency and relevance of the tariff concession scheme. The CEO must also ensure that the revocation process is documented and communicated appropriately, although no consultation was undertaken for this particular revocation as the TCO had not been used in the preceding two years. Additionally, the revocation order must comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the provisions that allow for the revocation of TCOs under section 269SD.
Breaching the obligations and requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901 can lead to various civil and criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not specify the exact offences or penalties for non-compliance with the revocation of TCOs, the Act generally provides for penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. For instance, section 270 of the Act outlines the general penalty provisions, which can include fines and imprisonment for breaches of customs laws. The maximum penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the offence. It is important for entities governed by the Act to adhere to its requirements to avoid any potential civil or criminal consequences.