EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 14/2006
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(2) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that, in making a TCO, there has been a transcription error in the description of goods the subject of the TCO including the tariff classification that is stated in the TCO to apply to the goods, the CEO may:
− make an order revoking the TCO; and
− make a new TCO in respect of goods that corrects the error.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 14/2006 was made on 14 February 2006. It revokes TCO 0515684 and makes TCO 0603560 because of a certain transcription error.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken since the change is minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(3) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day on which the TCO came into force and the new TCO has effect from the revocation of the old TCO.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.14/2006 revoked 0515684 and made new TCO 0603560 on 14 February 2006.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 14/2006, enacted in 2006, addresses a specific issue concerning the correction of transcription errors in Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. This legislation was introduced to allow for the revocation of a TCO and the issuance of a new TCO when a transcription error is identified in the description of goods or their tariff classification. The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides the legal framework for customs duties and tariff concessions, and this instrument is an administrative action taken by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to ensure the accuracy of TCOs. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity and correctness of the tariff concession scheme by allowing for the necessary corrections to be made without the need for extensive legislative amendments.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 14/2006 operates within the framework of the Customs Act 1901, specifically addressing the scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) are made and revoked. This instrument is applicable to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO), who is responsible for managing TCOs to ensure that lower rates of customs duty are applied to goods for which such orders exist. The legislation applies to goods that are subject to a TCO, and its scope is limited to the correction of transcription errors in the description of goods and the tariff classification stated in the TCO. This instrument has a national jurisdictional reach, as it is enacted under the Commonwealth of Australia's authority. It is important to note that the instrument does not undergo consultation due to its minor or machinery nature, which means it does not substantially alter existing arrangements. The revocation and issuance of new TCOs are effective from the day the original TCO came into force, and this order operates despite the prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments as set out in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 14/2006, made under the Customs Act 1901, is primarily concerned with the revocation and creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) due to a transcription error. Section 269C of the Act enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to create a TCO if an application is made and certain criteria are met. Specifically, if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application is lodged, a TCO may be issued. However, section 269P stipulates that if a TCO contains a transcription error concerning the description of goods or the tariff classification, the CEO has the authority to revoke the existing TCO and issue a new one to correct the error, as outlined in subsection 269SD(2).
The obligations imposed by this Instrument on the parties involved are primarily administrative and corrective in nature. The CEO must ensure that any TCOs made are accurate and correctly reflect the intended goods and tariff classifications. If an error is identified, the CEO is required to revoke the erroneous TCO and issue a corrected one without delay. This process ensures that the intended tariff concessions are applied correctly and that there is no financial or regulatory advantage gained due to an administrative oversight.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not specify particular penalties for the failure to comply with the requirements of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 14/2006. However, the incorrect application of customs duty due to an uncorrected transcription error could lead to financial penalties or other compliance issues for the entities involved. The revocation and correction of a TCO are administrative actions designed to rectify errors and ensure that the correct tariffs are applied, thereby avoiding potential legal or financial repercussions for businesses or the government.
The commencement provisions of the Instrument are detailed in subsection 269SD(3), which states that the revocation of a TCO takes effect from the date the original TCO came into force, while the new TCO takes effect from the date of the revocation of the old TCO. This ensures a seamless transition and prevents any gap in tariff concessions. Furthermore, subsection 269SD(6) clarifies that these provisions operate despite any prohibitions in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which would otherwise prevent certain retrospective legislative instruments from being made. This ensures that the necessary corrections can be implemented without being hindered by retrospective legislative restrictions.