EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 12/2005
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
– that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
– that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Antique Baths Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 9508055 which covers bath tubs.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 12/2005 was made on 22 June 2005. It revokes TCO 9508055 as the CEO is satisfied that Antique Baths Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.12/2005 revoked 9508055 on 22 June 2005.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 12/2005, enacted on 22 June 2005, is an instrument under the Customs Act 1901 that addresses the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). This instrument was introduced to respond to the situation where a TCO may no longer be justifiable if local production of substitutable goods has commenced in Australia. The instrument was made in response to a request from Antique Baths Pty Ltd to revoke TCO 9508055, which pertains to bath tubs. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who is mandated under the Customs Act 1901 to make such orders when satisfied that the conditions for revocation have been met, ensuring that the TCO would not have been issued if the current circumstances had existed at the time of the initial application. The policy objective underlying this instrument is to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme by ensuring that concessions are not granted when they are no longer necessary.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 12/2005 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. It specifically concerns TCO 9508055, which was covering bath tubs and was revoked upon the request of Antique Baths Pty Ltd, a producer in Australia of goods substitutable to those covered by the TCO. The Act provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make and revoke TCOs, ensuring that lower rates of customs duty apply to certain goods when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The revocation process under sections 269SB, 269SC, and 269SD of the Act allows for the cancellation of TCOs if it is determined that substitutable goods are now being produced domestically. This revocation applies on the day the request was lodged, overriding certain prohibitions against retrospective legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The revocation order is effective immediately upon the request being lodged, as mandated by the Customs Act.
Key Provisions
The main provisions of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 12/2005 (the Instrument) pertain to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 9508055, which previously provided a lower rate of customs duty for bath tubs. Section 269SB of the Customs Act 1901 allows a person who claims to produce substitutable goods in Australia to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to revoke a TCO if they believe the TCO should not have been granted. Under sections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must revoke the TCO if satisfied that the requesting party is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the revocation request were the original application. The CEO's satisfaction with these conditions led to the revocation of TCO 9508055 as per the Instrument.
The Instrument imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, Antique Baths Pty Ltd, as the requesting party, must demonstrate to the CEO that they are a producer of substitutable goods in Australia. This involves providing evidence that they produce goods which can replace those covered by the TCO in question. Secondly, the CEO is obligated to make a decision on the request as soon as practicable and to publish a notice in a Gazette if a revocation request is made, as stipulated in section 269SC(1A) of the Act. The CEO must include details of the TCO and the request for revocation in this notice. The CEO’s decision-making process involves assessing whether the conditions specified in section 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act are met.
In terms of breaches and penalties, the Customs Act 1901 does not specify penalties for failing to comply with the requirements to revoke a TCO when the conditions are met. However, any failure by the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette as required by section 269SC(1A) could be subject to general administrative law principles and judicial review for non-compliance with statutory obligations. There are no explicit criminal or civil penalties stated within the Act or the Instrument for the revocation process itself, but the revocation of a TCO can have significant financial implications for importers of the affected goods, as the standard customs duty rates would apply again.
The Instrument also addresses the commencement of the revocation. According to subsection 269SC(6) of the Act, the revocation takes effect on the day the request for revocation was lodged. This ensures that the revocation is effective from the date the request was made, despite any prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments under section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This legal framework ensures that the revocation process is transparent and timely, providing clarity and fairness to all parties involved in the customs duty regime.