EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 108/2011
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(1A) of the Act provides that the CEO may revoke a TCO if he or she is satisfied on any day that a TCO is no longer required because, in the 2 years preceding that day, the TCO has not been quoted in an import entry to secure a concessional rate of duty.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011 was made on 27 July 2011. It revokes TCO 0721626 as the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken. Since the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years, the revocation of the TCO will not have an effect on business.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(1A) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day the CEO becomes satisfied that the TCO has not been used in the preceding 2 years.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011 revoked TCO 0721626 on 27 July 2011.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides for the application of lower rates of customs duty to certain goods through the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders are administered by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who can both create and revoke them under specific conditions. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011 was introduced to address the issue of unused TCOs, which are intended to benefit businesses by reducing customs duty. The instrument was made on 27 July 2011 and revokes TCO 0721626, as the CEO determined that it had not been utilized for any import entries in the preceding two years. This revocation aligns with the policy objective of ensuring that tariff concessions are effectively utilised and relevant to current business practices. The revocation took effect from the date the CEO became satisfied about the inactivity of the TCO, and it operates without retrospective effect, in compliance with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that were previously established to allow for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. The Act pertains to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who has the authority to make and revoke such orders based on the criteria outlined in sections 269C and 269P. Specifically, this instrument revokes TCO 0721626, as the CEO determined that the TCO had not been utilised in the two years preceding the decision to revoke it, fulfilling the conditions set forth in subsection 269SD(1A). This revocation is effective from the date the CEO was satisfied that the TCO had not been used, which in this case was on 27 July 2011. The instrument operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction and does not specify exclusions or exemptions beyond the criteria for revocation. The revocation process does not require consultation, as the TCO had not been active, thereby ensuring that the revocation will not adversely impact any businesses.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011, under the Customs Act 1901, specifically targets the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0721626. This instrument, made on 27 July 2011, operates under the provisions of sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD(1A) of the Act, allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO if it has not been quoted in an import entry for a concessional rate of duty over the preceding two years. The instrument is effective from the day the CEO is satisfied that the TCO has not been used, which in this case was on 27 July 2011. This revocation means that the lower rate of customs duty previously applicable to goods under TCO 0721626 is no longer in effect.
The obligations imposed by this legislation on the parties involved are relatively straightforward. The CEO is required to monitor the use of TCOs and ensure that they are being applied appropriately. If the CEO determines that a TCO has not been quoted in an import entry for the required period, they must revoke the order. This ensures that tariff concessions are only applied when necessary and that they are not unduly benefiting parties that do not require them. The revocation process itself is governed by the provisions of the Customs Act, ensuring that it adheres to the legislative framework.
Breaching the requirements of the Customs Act, including failing to adhere to the conditions for maintaining a TCO, can have serious consequences. The Act provides for both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines, with the exact amount determined by the court. In more severe cases, individuals or entities can face criminal charges. For instance, section 281 of the Act outlines various criminal offences related to customs duty and can result in penalties including substantial fines and imprisonment. The maximum penalties for these offences can vary, but they are significant enough to deter non-compliance and ensure adherence to the legislative requirements.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 108/2011 ensures that tariff concessions are only applied when justified by the use of the relevant TCOs. By revoking TCO 0721626, the instrument ensures that the lower customs duty rates are not unnecessarily applied, maintaining the integrity of the tariff system. The process is transparent and governed by the Act, providing a clear framework for the CEO to follow. The potential penalties for non-compliance highlight the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches, ensuring that all parties understand the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements.