EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 7/2005
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0413697 which covers cooker,smoker and/or dryers.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 7/2005 was made on 16 May 2005. It revokes TCO 0413697 as the CEO is satisfied that Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.7/2005 revoked 0413697 on 16 May 2005.
Overview
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 7/2005, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to address a specific problem related to tariff concessions on imported goods. The Customs Act 1901 allows for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that reduce customs duty on certain goods, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. However, if a domestic producer subsequently begins producing such goods, it may request the revocation of the TCO. In this instance, Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd requested the revocation of TCO 0413697, which covers cooker, smoker, and/or dryers, on the basis that they have become a domestic producer of substitutable goods. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, in accordance with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901, and the policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted where there is no local production of the goods in question. The revocation came into force on the date the request was lodged, despite legislative constraints on retrospective legislative instruments.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 7/2005 applies to revoking a specific Tariff Concession Order (TCO) under the Customs Act 1901, as requested by Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd. The instrument revokes TCO 0413697 which pertains to cooker, smoker and/or dryers. The revocation is based on the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs being satisfied that Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods, and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the application for the TCO was lodged on the day the revocation request was made. This revocation applies nationally as it concerns the Commonwealth’s customs duties and concessions. The instrument operates within the legislative framework established by sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, and 269SC of the Customs Act 1901, which outline the process for making and revoking TCOs. Any exclusions or exemptions not explicitly stated in the Act itself are subject to the conditions set forth in the Act and the specific circumstances of the revocation request. The commencement of the revocation is immediate upon the lodgement of the revocation request, as specified by subsection 269SC(6) of the Act.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 7/2005, made under the Customs Act 1901, specifically targets the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0413697. This TCO previously applied a lower rate of customs duty to cooker, smoker, and/or dryers. Section 269SC of the Act outlines the process for the revocation of a TCO, which is triggered when a producer of substitutable goods requests the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke the concession. The CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if satisfied that the requesting party is indeed a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued if the request had been made on the day the original TCO application was lodged. In this case, Smo-King Ovens Pty Ltd successfully requested the revocation of TCO 0413697, leading to its revocation on 16 May 2005.
Under the Customs Act 1901, the obligations imposed on the parties revolve around transparency and timely responses. Section 269SC(1A) requires the CEO to publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request. This notice must include a statement that a revocation request has been made and provide full particulars of the TCO in question. This requirement ensures that all stakeholders are informed of the proceedings and can respond accordingly. Furthermore, the CEO must make a decision on the revocation request based on the criteria set out in section 269SC(1) and (3). This includes verifying the producer's status and determining whether the TCO would have been granted under the current conditions.
The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 7/2005 includes provisions for penalties and consequences in the event of non-compliance with the Customs Act 1901. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific penalties for breach, general provisions within the Act and related instruments may apply. Typically, breaches of the Customs Act can lead to both civil and criminal consequences. Civil penalties may include fines and the recovery of unpaid duties and taxes, while criminal penalties can result in imprisonment, reflecting the severity of non-compliance with customs regulations. The exact penalties depend on the nature and extent of the breach, as well as the discretion of the court.