Tariff Concession Revocation Order 05/2006

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2006L00545 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2006

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.

Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.

Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:

               that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and

               that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0201447 which covers Longwall Mining Roof Support Machines.

Instrument

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 5/2006 was made on 3 February 2006. It revokes TCO 0201447 as the CEO is satisfied that Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.

Consultation

Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.

Commencement

Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged.  Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.

Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.5/2006 revoked 0201447 on 3 February 2006.

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2006 was enacted to address the issue of tariff concessions under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument was introduced to revoke a specific Tariff Concession Order (TCO) following a request by a producer of substitutable goods. The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition and concession of customs duties. This legislation specifically allows for the creation and revocation of TCOs, which provide for lower rates of customs duty on certain goods. The policy objective of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2006 is to ensure that tariff concessions are not granted where substitutable goods are being produced in Australia, thereby maintaining a fair and competitive market for domestic producers. The instrument revokes TCO 0201447 following a request by Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods, which demonstrated that the concession was no longer justified under the terms of the Act.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2006 applies to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0201447, which pertains to Longwall Mining Roof Support Machines. The Instrument operates under the Customs Act 1901, which governs the imposition and concession of customs duties in Australia. The Act applies to entities and individuals involved in the importation of goods subject to customs duties, as well as those seeking tariff concessions. The revocation of a TCO impacts the rates of customs duty applied to specific imported goods, thus influencing the operations of businesses reliant on these imports. The Instrument's jurisdiction is Commonwealth-wide, applying across all states and territories in Australia. The revocation of a TCO is contingent upon the conditions specified in the Customs Act, including the absence of Australian-produced substitutable goods and the CEO's satisfaction that the TCO would not have been granted if the current circumstances existed at the time of the initial application. The Instrument takes effect from the date the revocation request is lodged, ensuring that the cessation of the tariff concession is immediate upon the CEO's decision to revoke the order.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 5/2006, made under the Customs Act 1901, pertain to the revocation of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) for Longwall Mining Roof Support Machines, identified as TCO 0201447. Section 269SB of the Act allows a producer of substitutable goods in Australia to request the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to revoke a TCO. Pursuant to sections 269SC(1) and (3), the CEO is required to revoke the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO if the request for revocation was received on the day the original TCO application was lodged. The Instrument revokes TCO 02014447 as the CEO is satisfied with the request from Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd, a producer of substitutable goods. The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties involved. The CEO must review the application for revocation and satisfy themselves of the conditions stipulated in sections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act. Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd, as the requesting party, must demonstrate that it is a producer of substitutable goods in Australia and provide sufficient evidence to support its claim. The CEO is also required to publish a notice in a Gazette, as per subsection 269SC(1A), detailing the request for revocation and the particulars of the TCO in question. This ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for public comment. The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance in this context. However, any failure by the CEO to adhere to the statutory requirements for revoking a TCO, or for Inbye Mining Services Pty Ltd to provide accurate information, could lead to legal challenges or administrative actions. The revocation itself, as detailed in the Instrument, takes effect on the day the request to revoke the TCO was lodged, as stipulated by subsection 269SC(6), thereby ensuring the revocation does not have retrospective effect as per the prohibition in section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This ensures the revocation adheres to legislative timelines and requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.