EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 2/2010
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Section 269SB of the Act provides, in part, that a person claiming to be a producer in Australia of substitutable goods in relation to the goods covered by a TCO may request the CEO to revoke the TCO.
Under subsections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO must make an order revoking the TCO if the CEO is satisfied:
− that, on the day of lodgement of the request, the person requesting the revocation of the TCO is a producer in Australia of goods that are substitutable goods in relation to the goods the subject of the TCO; and
− that, if the TCO were not in force on that day but that day were the day on which the application for that TCO was lodged, the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Soma Power Pty Ltd requested that the CEO revoke TCO 0916497 which covers wind powered generators.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 2/2010 was made on 25 September 2009. It revokes TCO 0916497 as the CEO is satisfied that Soma Power Pty Ltd is a producer in Australia of substitutable goods and that the CEO would not have made the TCO.
Consultation
Subsection 269SC(1A) of the Act provides that as soon as practicable after receiving a request for revocation of a TCO, the CEO must publish in a Gazette a notice which includes a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates.
Commencement
Subsection 269SC(6) provides that an order revoking a TCO comes into force on the day on which the request to revoke the TCO was lodged. Subsection 239SD(8) provides, in part, that subsection 269SC(6) has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No.2/2010, TCO 0916497, was revoked on 25 September 2009 with the Revocation date of effect as from 6 August 2009.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation of customs and excise, including the imposition of tariffs and the granting of tariff concessions. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No. 2/2010 addresses the problem of revoking tariff concession orders when a domestic producer of substitutable goods emerges. This instrument was created to provide flexibility within the scheme to ensure that Australian industry remains competitive and that tariff concessions are only granted when there is no domestic production of the goods in question. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under the authority granted by sections 269C, 269P, 269SB, and 269SC of the Customs Act 1901, and its policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are only granted when there is a genuine need to protect Australian industry from international competition.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 governs the regulation of imports and exports in Australia and provides mechanisms for the establishment and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which lower the rate of customs duty on specified goods. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to create TCOs if, at the time of application, no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia. Should a local producer of substitutable goods emerge after the TCO is established, they can request the CEO to revoke the order. The Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument No 2/2010 was made in response to such a request from Soma Power Pty Ltd, leading to the revocation of TCO 0916497, which covered wind-powered generators, on the basis that the CEO was satisfied Soma Power Pty Ltd was a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been granted if the request had been made on the day the original application was lodged. The CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a revocation request, detailing the request and the particulars of the TCO. The revocation order takes effect on the day the request was lodged, despite certain prohibitions on retrospective legislative instruments.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concessions Revocation Instrument 2/2010 (the Instrument) pertain to the revocation of Tariff Concession Order (TCO) 0916497. Section 269SB of the Customs Act 1901 allows for a request to be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) by a producer in Australia of substitutable goods, seeking the revocation of a TCO. Under sections 269SC(1) and (3) of the Act, the CEO is required to make an order revoking the TCO if satisfied that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the request for revocation had been lodged on the day the original TCO application was made. Pursuant to these provisions, the Instrument revokes TCO 0916497, which pertains to wind-powered generators, due to the CEO's satisfaction that Soma Power Pty Ltd is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been issued.
The Instrument imposes certain obligations and requirements on the CEO. Under subsection 269SC(1A) of the Customs Act 1901, the CEO must publish a notice in a Gazette as soon as practicable after receiving a request for the revocation of a TCO. This notice must include a statement that a request has been lodged and the full particulars of the TCO to which the request relates. The CEO must also ensure that the order revoking the TCO comes into force on the day the request for revocation was lodged, as stipulated in subsection 269SC(6) of the Act. Furthermore, the CEO must be satisfied, in accordance with the criteria set out in subsections 269SC(1) and (3), that the applicant is a producer of substitutable goods and that the TCO would not have been made if the revocation request had been lodged on the day the original TCO application was made.
The Customs Act 1901 provides for both civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the Instrument itself, breaches of the Act may result in civil penalties, including fines, or criminal penalties, including imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Customs Act 1901 can vary widely, with some offences carrying maximum fines of up to $22,200 for individuals and $111,000 for corporations, while others may carry imprisonment terms ranging from a few months to several years. The precise penalties applicable to a particular breach would depend on the specific provision of the Act that has been contravened and the circumstances of the offence.