EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1141354
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Temperzone Australia Pt Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain tubes on 12 December 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1141354 was made on 06 March 2012. It declares that those certain tubes are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1141354 is taken to have come into force on 12 December 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework for the administration of customs duties and includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The primary objective of TCOs, as outlined in Part XVA of the Act, is to provide tariff concessions for goods that do not have substitutable alternatives produced in Australia. This legislative mechanism aims to facilitate trade by reducing customs duties on specific goods, provided that there are no domestic substitutes for these items. The process involves an application to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who evaluates whether the application meets the core criteria, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. Upon meeting these criteria, the CEO issues a TCO, which results in a concession on the duty applicable to the specified goods. In the case of Temperzone Australia Pt Ltd, a TCO was granted for certain tubes, resulting in a reduction of duty from the general rate of 5% to free, effective from the date of the application, 12 December 2011. This approach ensures that trade is not unduly hindered by tariff barriers where local production alternatives do not exist.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, outlines the process for granting Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs may reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods. The Act applies to individuals or entities that seek to import goods that are eligible for reduced duty rates under the TCO scheme. The application must meet the core criteria stipulated under section 269C of the Act, which requires that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. This process is available to any applicant who lodges a valid application under section 269F of the Act, provided the goods are not excluded under section 269SJ. The Act’s application is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, thus extending across all states and territories in Australia. The Explanatory Statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1141354 clarifies that the TCO does not impose any new liabilities or affect the rights of any person adversely, thereby ensuring that the benefits of the tariff concession are conferred without retroactive disadvantage to importers or other stakeholders.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made, as outlined in Part XVA. Section 269F allows an individual to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of specified goods. If the application is not for goods listed in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for a TCO, the CEO must then determine if the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. A TCO application satisfies the core criteria if, on the day the application was made, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as per section 269C.
Entities or individuals who seek a TCO must ensure that the goods in question do not have substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application. This involves demonstrating that the goods are unique or not replaceable by locally produced alternatives, which is essential for the CEO to proceed with the application. The CEO must also consider the definitions provided in sections 269D (goods produced in Australia), 269E (ordinary course of business), and 269F (substitutable goods). If satisfied, the CEO must issue a written TCO as stipulated in subsection 269P(3), which declares the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The Customs Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO to review TCO applications thoroughly and ensure they meet the core criteria. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made, as required by subsection 269K(1). In the case of TCO No. 1141354, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. Additionally, the Act mandates that TCOs come into force on the day the application is lodged, ensuring that the rights of parties are protected as of the application date.
There are no specific offences or penalties outlined in the Act for the failure to comply with TCO provisions, but the Act does ensure that the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) are not adversely affected by a TCO. Importers of goods subject to a TCO can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is deemed to have come into force under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. The Act explicitly states that a TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, ensuring that there are no punitive measures for non-compliance with the terms of the TCO itself.