EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1139401
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Dongwha Timbers applied for a TCO in respect of certain log debarking line on 25 November 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1139401 was made on 13 February 2012. It declares that those certain log debarking line are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1139401 is taken to have come into force on 25 November 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework within which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a mechanism that allows for the reduction or exemption of customs duties on specific goods, provided certain criteria are met. The primary objective of this Act, as outlined in its provisions, is to facilitate the import of goods by reducing the financial burden on importers, thereby promoting trade and economic activity. In the case of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1139401, the Act was applied to exempt certain log debarking lines from the general customs duty, following an application by Dongwha Timbers, after the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. This legislative measure ensures that the rights of importers are positively affected, allowing for potential duty refunds on goods imported since the TCO came into effect.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1139401, made under section 269F of the Customs Act 1901, applies specifically to the goods that are the subject of the Instrument, namely certain log debarking lines. This legislation concerns the application process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are designed to provide lower rates of customs duty for goods that meet certain criteria. The Act applies to any person or entity that seeks to import the specified goods and benefit from the lower duty rate, contingent upon the conditions outlined in the Act being satisfied. The geographic reach of this legislation is nationwide, as it pertains to the importation of goods into Australia, and is subject to the overarching authority of the Commonwealth. The Act excludes goods specified in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO. Furthermore, the Act's application can be extended or restricted via subordinate instruments, although in this instance, no such extensions or restrictions are noted. The commencement of the Tariff Concession Order is effective from the date the application was lodged, 25 November 2011, and does not affect any pre-existing rights or liabilities of parties other than the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) includes provisions for the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA, which are designed to provide lower rates of customs duty on certain goods. Section 269F allows an application to be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, provided they are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The CEO must then decide whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. For the purposes of these sections, substitutable goods are defined in section 269D and ordinary course of business in section 269E, with specific definitions provided for in sections 269D and 269E respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a written order, the TCO, must be made under section 269P(3).
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by this Act include the requirement for applicants to ensure their goods meet the criteria for a TCO, specifically that no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia. The CEO, on receiving a valid application, is required to make a decision within the framework provided by sections 269C and 269P. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette under subsection 269K(1) inviting submissions from any interested parties regarding the proposed TCO, although in the case of TCO No. 1139401, no such submissions were received. The TCO itself, once made, benefits importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is taken to have come into force under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties for breaches related to TCOs. However, any actions taken by the CEO under the Act, such as making a TCO, are subject to the general legal frameworks governing administrative actions. These frameworks provide mechanisms for review and appeal, which can include judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977, where aggrieved parties may seek to challenge the CEO's decisions. Furthermore, failure to comply with the terms of a TCO could potentially result in the imposition of duties or fines under other provisions of the Customs Act or related legislation. However, the Act ensures that the rights of individuals are not adversely affected by the registration of a TCO, meaning that any liabilities imposed prior to the TCO's effective date are not retroactively altered.