Tariff Concession Order 1138953

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00816 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138953

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Boral Bricks Western Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain concrete moulds on 23 November 2011.

Instrument

TCO No 1138953 was made on 13 February 2012.  It declares that those certain concrete moulds are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 1138953 is taken to have come into force on 23 November 2011.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide for the administration of customs and excise, including the imposition of tariffs on imported goods. The Act was introduced to regulate and control the importation of goods into Australia, and to generate revenue for the Commonwealth through the imposition of customs duty. Part XVA of the Act establishes a scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that can be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to provide for a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods. The policy objective of TCOs is to support Australian industries by providing tariff relief on goods that are not produced domestically. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138953 was made under this scheme in response to an application by Boral Bricks Western Australia for a TCO on certain concrete moulds, and provides for a reduction in the rate of duty on these goods from 5% to free.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138953, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the specific goods for which Boral Bricks Western Australia made an application, namely certain concrete moulds. The legislation is applicable to any entity that imports these goods into Australia, thereby providing them with a lower rate of customs duty as specified in the instrument. The instrument's geographic reach is national, as it pertains to the importation of goods into Australia and is subject to the broader provisions of the Customs Act 1901, which applies across the Commonwealth. The application of the Tariff Concession Order (TCO) is contingent upon the core criteria being met, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. The instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person. The TCO came into force on the date the application was lodged, 23 November 2011. The Customs Act 1901 may extend or restrict the application of such TCOs through subordinate instruments, which allows for the regulation and adjustment of the concessions granted.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Customs Act 1901, as applied in Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138953, concern the process and criteria for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Section 269F allows a person to apply for a TCO in respect of goods. Section 269C stipulates that for an application to meet the core criteria, no substitutable goods must have been produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Section 269P(3) requires the CEO to make a written order if the application meets the core criteria. Section 269K(1) mandates the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties once an application is accepted as valid. The TCO in question, No. 1138953, was made for certain concrete moulds, declaring them subject to a duty-free rate under the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on parties or entities governed by this legislation include the duty for the CEO to thoroughly evaluate each TCO application against the core criteria outlined in section 269C. This involves verifying that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the application date. The CEO must also ensure compliance with the requirement to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any person who may have reasons why the TCO should not be made, as per section 269K(1). The CEO's role is to act on the basis of these submissions and make an informed decision on whether to grant the TCO. Additionally, the TCO must not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted before the date of registration, ensuring that the rights of importers are beneficially affected. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly detail specific criminal or civil penalties for failure to comply with the TCO provisions. However, the legislation ensures that the rights of a person, other than the Commonwealth, will not be adversely affected by the TCO. The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities on any person. The consequences for non-compliance would likely be determined by other provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and related regulations, which might include administrative penalties, fines, or other legal actions for improper conduct related to the import and duty of goods. The maximum penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach and the relevant sections of the Customs Act 1901 or associated regulations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.