Tariff Concession Order 1138786

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00758 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138786

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

VH International Holding Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain crushing mills on 21 November 2011.

Instrument

TCO No 1138786 was made on 06 February 2012.  It declares that those certain crushing mills are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 1138786 is taken to have come into force on 21 November 2011.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation was introduced to address the need for tariff concessions for certain imported goods that have no substitutable Australian-made alternatives, thereby fostering a fair trading environment while encouraging domestic production where feasible. The policy objective is to provide relief to importers by reducing or eliminating customs duty on specified goods, thus potentially lowering the cost of importing and making these goods more competitively priced in the Australian market. VH International Holding Pty Ltd applied for a TCO for certain crushing mills, and following a review, the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, leading to the issuance of TCO No. 1138786, which reduced the duty on these goods from 5% to free.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138786 applies to the import of certain crushing mills, as specified in the instrument, by providing a concession on customs duty under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under section 269F of the Act, following an application by VH International Holding Pty Ltd on 21 November 2011. The Act applies to the individuals and entities responsible for importing these goods, with the geographic reach extending to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, as defined by the Customs Act 1901. The application of the TCO is contingent upon the condition that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the date the application was lodged, as per section 269C of the Act. The instrument also provides that the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth in respect of anything done or omitted before the date of registration. The concession becomes effective from the date of the application, 21 November 2011, and allows for the duty-free importation of the specified goods.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1138786, relate to the application, assessment, and implementation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO concerning specified goods, provided the goods are not those listed in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The CEO must then determine if the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. If the criteria are met, the CEO is mandated by subsection 269P(3) to issue a written order (TCO) declaring that the specified goods are subject to a prescribed item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thus applying a zero rate of duty instead of the general rate. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. For applicants, it is crucial to ensure that their applications are complete and meet the core criteria, particularly focusing on the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The CEO, on the other hand, is obligated to assess the application against these criteria and, if satisfied, to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties. If no submissions are received, the CEO must proceed to make the TCO. Additionally, the Act mandates that the CEO must not accept applications for goods listed in section 269SJ and requires the publication of the TCO in the Gazette, thereby ensuring transparency and allowing public input. In terms of breaches and consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly detail offences or penalties related to the incorrect application or misuse of TCOs. However, any non-compliance with the customs regulations generally could lead to civil or criminal penalties. For example, under section 226 of the Customs Act, the imposition of a fine or imprisonment, or both, may apply for offences such as making a false statement or providing misleading information. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they can include substantial fines and imprisonment terms as determined by the court. The TCO itself, while providing tariff concessions, does not impose any liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth and does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration. Importers, however, benefit from the ability to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date, as provided under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. This mechanism ensures that the rights of importers are safeguarded and that they can recoup duties paid on eligible goods.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.