EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1135768
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Welding Industries of Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain welding generators on 13 October 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1135768 was made on 12 January 2012. It declares that those certain welding generators are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1135768 is taken to have come into force on 13 October 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide for the regulation of customs and excise, including the imposition of customs duty on imported goods. To address gaps in the tariff structure and provide relief to certain industries, Part XVA of the Act introduces the scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions on specific goods. This legislative framework was introduced by the Parliament of Australia with the aim of ensuring fair and competitive access to certain imported goods by reducing the customs duty burden on them. Instrument TCO No. 1135768, issued on 12 January 2012, is an example of such a concession, applying to certain welding generators by setting their duty rate at free, down from the general rate of 5%. This was in response to an application by Welding Industries of Australia, and no objections were raised during the consultation period.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This mechanism applies to applications made by individuals or entities seeking to reduce customs duties on specific goods, provided these goods are not specified as ineligible in section 269SJ of the Act. The core criteria for approval of a TCO, as outlined in section 269C, include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of the application. The Act defines "substitutable goods" in section 269D, "ordinary course of business" in section 269E, and specifies the process for the CEO to issue a written TCO in section 269P(3) if the criteria are met. The application process requires public notice and opportunity for submissions, although in the case of TCO No 1135768 concerning welding generators, no submissions were received. The TCO came into force on the date of application, 13 October 2011, and while it benefits importers by allowing them to seek duty refunds for imports since that date under Regulation 126(1)(r), it does not impose any liabilities or disadvantage any person's pre-existing rights.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which permit a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods (s 269F). For a TCO to be considered, a person must apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO), who must then ascertain if the application meets the core criteria. This is detailed in section 269C of the Act, which stipulates that a TCO application is valid if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application is lodged. The definitions of "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are further elaborated in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a written order is made declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, as outlined in subsection 269P(3) of the Act.
Under this legislative framework, the obligations for the parties involved are quite specific. For instance, the applicant must ensure that the goods in question meet the core criteria for a TCO, which includes the absence of substitutable goods being produced in Australia. The CEO, upon receiving a valid application, has the duty to make a written order if the core criteria are satisfied. Additionally, as per subsection 269K(1) of the Act, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to submit objections to the TCO. If no objections are received, the CEO is required to proceed with making the TCO.
The Act also delineates the consequences for non-compliance or breaches. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly state offences or penalties, it is reasonable to infer that failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or the TCO could lead to legal repercussions. Typically, under the Customs Act 1901, breaches might result in civil or criminal penalties, which could include fines or even imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. However, the exact penalties would need to be referred to the relevant sections of the Act or subsidiary legislation for precise details. The statement clarifies that the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on anyone in respect of actions taken before the date of registration, ensuring that the rights of importers are beneficially affected and that no retrospective liabilities are created.