EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1132155
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Ferro Corporation (Aust) Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain chromium green-black hematite pigments on 20 September 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1132155 was made on 21 December 2011. It declares that those certain chromium green-black hematite pigments are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1132155 is taken to have come into force on 20 September 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to provide a comprehensive framework for the regulation of customs and excise duties. This Act includes provisions for the imposition, collection, and administration of customs and excise duties, as well as for the control of goods entering and leaving Australia. One of the key mechanisms introduced under this Act is the ability for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can lower the customs duty on certain goods. This was introduced to address the need for flexibility in tariff applications to support industries and economic activities where domestic production is not viable or where specific goods are critical for particular uses. The policy objective behind this legislative tool is to provide economic benefits by reducing the cost of imported goods, thereby encouraging trade and supporting certain industries. The instrument referenced, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1132155, exemplifies this process by reducing the duty on certain chromium green-black hematite pigments to zero, reflecting the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through its Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1132155, pertains to the application process and approval of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislative instrument applies to individuals or entities that seek to import specific goods into Australia and qualify for a concession on customs duty, provided that these goods do not fall under the prohibited categories outlined in section 269SJ of the Act. The application process requires the applicant to demonstrate that the goods in question are not substitutable by any goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as defined by the Act. The geographic scope of the Act is national, affecting all imports into Australia, and it extends to all industries and types of goods that meet the criteria for tariff concessions. The Act does not impose any disadvantages or liabilities on third parties as a result of the TCO, and it does not retroactively affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth. The commencement date of the TCO aligns with the date of the application, ensuring that the tariff concessions apply from the moment the application is lodged. The Act may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments, which may include specific regulations or further guidelines issued by the CEO.
Key Provisions
Section 269F of the Customs Act 1901 permits an application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) for goods, provided they are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act. If an application is made, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must determine if it meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. For an application to meet these criteria, it must be established that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application was lodged (section 269C). The definitions of 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269P(3) respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order, declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, as per section 269P(3). In the case of TCO No. 1132155, the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, and therefore, the CEO made the order on 21 December 2011.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO when considering a TCO application. Under subsection 269K(1), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid. This notice invites any person who believes the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. In the case of TCO No. 1132155, the CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation. The Act also stipulates that a TCO is to be taken as having come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged (subsection 269S(1)). Consequently, TCO No. 1132155 is deemed to have come into force on 20 September 2011.
The TCO does not adversely affect the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration. Nor does it impose any liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration (subsection 269S(3)). However, the rights of importers will be beneficially affected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is deemed to have come into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 may lead to offences, penalties, or other civil and criminal consequences. The specific penalties for breaches are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, but they could potentially include fines or other civil penalties, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The Act does not specify maximum penalties in this context, but breaches of customs laws can often result in significant financial penalties under Australian law.