EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1129154
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Morbark Pacific Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain screeners on 25 August 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1129154 was made on 21 November 2011. It declares that those certain screeners are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1129154 is taken to have come into force on 25 August 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, facilitates the process by which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to lower the customs duty on certain goods. This piece of legislation was designed to address the gap in providing relief to importers who are unable to source goods domestically, thereby encouraging trade and economic efficiency. The explanatory statement reveals that Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1129154 was created to provide tariff concessions for specific screeners, as applied by Morbark Pacific Pty Ltd. The policy objective is to ensure that Australian importers are not disadvantaged by the absence of locally produced substitutable goods, thereby facilitating fair trade practices and benefiting the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for refunds on duties paid on these goods since the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to the application process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), enabling the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to grant tariff concessions for certain imported goods. Specifically, the Act applies to entities or individuals seeking tariff concessions for goods imported into Australia, provided these goods are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which excludes certain types of goods from being subject to a TCO. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it operates within the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act’s application is limited by the core criteria outlined in sections 269C and 269D, ensuring that a TCO can only be granted if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application is lodged. The Act may extend its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations, which provide further definitions and procedural details. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1129154 is an example of such an instrument, which declares that certain screeners are subject to a free rate of duty as per item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Customs Act 1901, specifically in relation to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), include sections 269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, 269F, 269P, and 269SJ (269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, 269F, 269P, 269SJ). Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO in respect of goods. If the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ, the CEO must determine whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. A TCO application meets the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. The CEO is required to make a written order if satisfied that the application meets these criteria, as per section 269P(3).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, the CEO must ensure that any TCO application is valid and not in respect of goods that cannot be subject to a TCO as per section 269SJ. Once a valid application is received, the CEO must assess whether it meets the core criteria, specifically if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the application date (269C). If the criteria are satisfied, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made, as per subsection 269K(1). The CEO must also consider any submissions received and make a decision on whether to issue a TCO.
There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences stated for breaches of the TCO provisions in the Act. However, the Act ensures that a TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration, nor impose liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration (269S(1)). This means that the TCO provisions are designed to avoid disadvantaging or imposing liabilities on individuals or entities due to its implementation. The Act also provides for the possibility of duty refunds for importers of goods subject to a TCO, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.