Tariff Concession Order 1127069

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00311 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1127069

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain sweepers on 10 August 2011.

Instrument

TCO No 1127069 was made on 10 November 2011.  It declares that those certain sweepers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 1127069 is taken to have come into force on 10 August 2011.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the administration of customs and excise, including the ability to grant tariff concession orders (TCOs) under Part XVA. The purpose of these concessions is to provide relief on customs duty for certain goods, subject to specific criteria. This legislative measure was introduced to address the need for more flexible and responsive trade policies that could support industry development and competitiveness. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1127069, issued under this Act, specifically addresses the application by MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd for a TCO concerning certain sweepers, resulting in a reduction of customs duty from the general rate of 5% to free. The instrument ensures that the application of the concession does not adversely affect any rights or impose liabilities on non-Commonwealth entities prior to the effective date of the concession.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1127069 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods, in this case, certain sweepers, and the process by which a lower rate of customs duty is applied to them. This instrument is particularly relevant to entities or individuals who import these goods, as it directly impacts the customs duty payable on them. The application for such tariff concessions is made under section 269F of the Act, where an entity such as MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). The scope of the Act extends to ensuring that the goods in question are not substitutable by any goods produced in Australia, as per section 269C. The Act also includes provisions for publishing notices in the Gazette to invite objections to the tariff concession, as per subsection 269K(1), though in this instance, no objections were received. The instrument, which came into force on the date of application, does not affect any pre-existing rights or impose new liabilities on any party except the Commonwealth. The jurisdictional reach of this legislation is inherently tied to the Customs Act 1901, which is a Commonwealth Act. Therefore, the application and effect of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1127069 are national in scope, governed by the Commonwealth. The instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose liabilities on anyone but does beneficially affect the rights of importers by potentially allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on the goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force, as per the Regulations under paragraph 126(1)(r). This particular instrument and its concessions are subject to the overarching framework provided by the Customs Act 1901 and any subordinate instruments or regulations that further define the scope and application of tariff concessions.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA, which reduce the customs duty on specified goods (section 269F). An applicant can request a TCO for certain goods if they meet the core criteria, which include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia (section 269C). Goods that cannot be subject to a TCO are specified in section 269SJ. If the CEO is satisfied that an application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order (section 269P(3)). The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions against the TCO application (subsection 269K(1)). If no submissions are received, the CEO can proceed to make the TCO. In this case, the CEO issued TCO No 1127069 on 10 November 2011, applying to certain sweepers. This TCO declared that these sweepers are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, with a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%. The TCO came into effect on 10 August 2011, the date the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)). The TCO imposes specific obligations on the parties it governs. The CEO must ensure that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of the application. Importers benefit from the TCO by being able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, nor does it affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the TCO's registration. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or consequences for breach mentioned in the explanatory statement. However, non-compliance with the terms of the TCO, such as attempting to claim a refund for goods that do not qualify under the TCO, could potentially lead to civil or administrative consequences. The precise nature of these consequences would depend on the specific circumstances and applicable laws at the time.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.