EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1105243
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
McPherson's Consumer Products applied for a TCO in respect of certain tableware and kitchenware tongs on 07 February 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1105243 was made on 02 May 2011. It declares that those certain tableware and kitchenware tongs are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1105243 is taken to have come into force on 07 February 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1105243, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to address the need for tariff concessions for specific goods, in this case tableware and kitchenware tongs. The instrument was established to provide a lower rate of customs duty for these goods, in alignment with the provisions outlined in Part XVA of the Customs Act. The Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) scheme allows for the application of reduced customs duties on goods that meet specific criteria, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The policy objective of this instrument is to facilitate trade and potentially stimulate economic activity by reducing the cost of importing these goods, thereby making them more affordable for consumers and businesses. The instrument was developed following an application by McPherson's Consumer Products and was subsequently approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of application.
This instrument was enacted by the relevant authority under the Customs Act 1901, with the commencement date set as the day the application was lodged, 07 February 2011. The instrument ensures that the rights of importers are positively impacted, allowing them to apply for duty refunds on goods imported from the date the TCO came into force. This legislative measure ensures that no existing rights or liabilities of non-Commonwealth entities are adversely affected by the introduction of the TCO, thereby maintaining a balanced approach to trade regulation and tariff concession.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1105243, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the specific goods—certain tableware and kitchenware tongs—that McPherson's Consumer Products sought concessions for. This Act facilitates the application process for tariff concessions by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make written orders, known as Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), that declare goods eligible for reduced customs duty rates. The application and concession process is contingent upon the core criteria being met, specifically that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This TCO, effective from the date of application, 07 February 2011, provides a free rate of duty on the specified goods, which otherwise carry a general rate of duty of 5%. The instrument ensures that the rights of the Commonwealth and importers are protected, with no adverse effects on persons other than the Commonwealth and no imposition of new liabilities. The application process also mandates public consultation, though in this instance, no submissions were received.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1105243 under the Customs Act 1901 include sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269SJ (sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269SJ). Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in respect of goods. If the application meets the core criteria, the CEO is required to make a written order, which is the TCO, as per section 269P. Section 269C specifies the core criteria for a TCO, requiring that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Section 269SJ lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. The CEO must determine whether an application for a TCO meets the core criteria, as outlined in section 269C. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties (subsection 269K(1)). The CEO is also required to consider any submissions received and decide whether to make the TCO. If no submissions are received, as in this case, the CEO proceeds to make the TCO. The TCO specifies the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, and in this instance, it declares that the certain tableware and kitchenware tongs are subject to a free rate of duty instead of the general rate of 5%.
Under the Customs Act 1901, there are potential consequences for breaches of the legislation or non-compliance with the requirements of the Act. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is known that breaches of customs legislation can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines and the confiscation of goods, while criminal penalties can include imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. The maximum penalties for breaches would depend on the specific nature of the offence, as outlined in other sections of the Customs Act and related regulations. The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities on any person, ensuring that the rights of individuals or entities are not adversely affected by the order.