EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1101013
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Meridian Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain ore concentrator instrument compressors on 10 January 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1101013 was made on 28 March 2011. It declares that those certain ore concentrator instrument compressors are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1101013 is taken to have come into force on 10 January 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1101013, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the issue of providing tariff concessions for specific goods, thereby facilitating trade by reducing customs duty for those goods. The instrument was introduced by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs in response to an application by Meridian Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain ore concentrator instrument compressors, aiming to ensure that these goods are treated favourably under the customs duty regime when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The instrument was published in the Gazette to allow for public consultation, although no submissions were received. The instrument's policy objective is to enhance trade efficiency by eliminating or reducing the customs duty on certain imported goods, benefiting importers by potentially allowing them to claim refunds for duties paid before the concession was granted.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1101013, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to individuals or entities seeking tariff concessions for specific goods, namely certain ore concentrator instrument compressors, that Meridian Pty Ltd applied for on 10 January 2011. The Act facilitates the process whereby the Chief Executive Officer of Customs may grant a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) if certain criteria are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This legislation operates on a Commonwealth level and is aimed at ensuring that the importation of specified goods is not hindered by prohibitive customs duty rates. It allows for a lower rate of customs duty to be applied to goods that are the subject of a TCO, as long as they do not fall under the list of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act which are ineligible for such concessions. The TCO is effective from the date the application was lodged, which in this case is 10 January 2011, and does not retroactively affect any transactions or liabilities incurred prior to this date. The instrument does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on them in relation to actions taken before the TCO was registered.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, through its Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) (sections 269F and 269P). A TCO enables a lower rate of customs duty for certain goods. An application for a TCO can be submitted by any person, provided the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO (section 269F). If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, outlined in section 269C, they must make a written order declaring the goods eligible for a lower duty rate.
The core criteria for a TCO, as specified in section 269C, require that on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The definitions of key terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. If the CEO determines that these criteria are met, they must issue a TCO. In the case of Meridian Pty Ltd's application for certain ore concentrator instrument compressors, TCO No 1101013 was issued on 28 March 2011, applying a free rate of duty to these goods under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
The CEO must consult the public before making a TCO, by publishing a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not proceed (subsection 269K(1)). For TCO No 1101013, no submissions were received in response to this notice. The TCO is considered to have come into effect on the date the application was lodged, which in this instance was 10 January 2011 (subsection 269S(1)). Importantly, the TCO does not affect any rights of persons, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person for actions taken before the registration date. However, importers can benefit from the TCO by applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO, under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
The Customs Act 1901 imposes specific obligations on the CEO, including the duty to make a TCO if an application meets the core criteria, to consult the public before making a TCO, and to ensure the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth or impose any new liabilities. Failure to adhere to these requirements could result in legal challenges or nullification of the TCO. Additionally, any person found to have provided false or misleading information in an application for a TCO may face civil or criminal penalties under other sections of the Act, though specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in this explanatory statement.