EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1056466
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Citic Pacific Mining Management Pty ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain wharf fender components on 31 December 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1056466 was made on 21 March 2011. It declares that those certain wharf fender components are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1056466 is taken to have come into force on 31 December 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to provide for the administration of customs and excise, including the collection of duties and taxes on imported goods. The Act was amended in 2006 to introduce a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). The purpose of this scheme is to provide a lower rate of customs duty on goods that meet certain criteria, as specified in the Act. The scheme aims to promote Australian industry and employment by providing tariff relief on goods that are not produced in Australia and for which there are no suitable Australian-made alternatives.
The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1056466 indicates that Citic Pacific Mining Management Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain wharf fender components. The CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia and that the application met the core criteria, and therefore made a written order (TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies. The TCO provides a rate of duty of free on the wharf fender components, which is lower than the general rate of duty of 5%. The TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration, and importers of the goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to all individuals, entities, and industries involved in the importation of goods into Australia, as well as the transactions associated with such imports. The Act provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to provide relief for specific goods under certain conditions. This legislation has a national reach across the Commonwealth of Australia, with the application of TCOs governed by the Customs Act 1901 and the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The Act excludes certain goods from being subject to a TCO, as outlined in section 269SJ. Additionally, the Act allows for the creation of subordinate instruments to further specify the application and enforcement of TCOs. In this instance, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1056466 was created to grant a concession on wharf fender components, effectively setting their duty rate to free instead of the general rate of 5%. This TCO came into effect on the date of application, 31 December 2010, and does not affect any pre-existing rights or liabilities of persons other than the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Customs Act 1901, relevant to the Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 1056466, include sections 269F, 269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, and 269P. Section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO concerning specific goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application pertains to goods not specified in section 269SJ, they must then determine if the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. This involves confirming that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The definitions of 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B, respectively. If the CEO finds the application meets these criteria, they are required under section 269P(3) to issue a written TCO declaring the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. For instance, section 269K(1) mandates that the CEO, upon accepting a TCO application as valid, must publish a notice in the Gazette. This notice must include an invitation for any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be granted to submit their views to the CEO. Furthermore, section 269S(1) stipulates that a TCO comes into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged. In this case, TCO No. 1056466 is considered to have come into effect on 31 December 2010. The Act also ensures that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) as of the date of registration in a manner that disadvantages them or imposes liabilities for actions taken before the registration date. Importantly, the rights of importers are positively affected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
Regarding offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach, the Act does not specify particular penalties for failing to comply with the TCO provisions. However, the general legal framework under which the Customs Act operates could lead to various penalties for breaches. For example, penalties may include fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. These penalties are typically detailed within the broader legislative context of the Customs Act and related laws. The specific consequences for non-compliance would depend on the nature of the breach and would be adjudicated according to the relevant sections of the Act and any associated regulations or subsidiary legislation.