EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1051147
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
McPherson's Consumer Products applied for a TCO in respect of certain polyester bags on 18 November 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1051147 was made on 28 February 2011. It declares that those certain polyester bags are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1051147 is taken to have come into force on 18 November 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides the legal framework for the administration of customs duties and the regulation of goods entering and exiting Australia. The Act includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can be applied for by persons to obtain a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods, provided they meet specific criteria. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1051147 was introduced to address the need for concessional tariff rates for goods where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The policy objective of this instrument is to support industries by reducing the cost of importing certain goods, thereby making them more competitive in the Australian market and potentially benefiting consumers through lower prices. The instrument was developed in response to an application by McPherson's Consumer Products for tariff concessions on polyester bags, resulting in a tariff rate reduction from 5% to free for these goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1051147 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to goods specified in the instrument, namely certain polyester bags, and aims to provide a lower rate of customs duty for these goods. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) if certain criteria are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The TCO No. 1051147 was made on 28 February 2011, declaring that the specific polyester bags are subject to a reduced customs duty as outlined in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This order benefits importers by potentially allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since 18 November 2010, the date the application for the TCO was lodged. The application of this TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's effective date. The instrument's reach is national, aligning with the overarching Customs Act 1901 which operates at the Commonwealth level.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation (F2011L00717) revolve around Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. Specifically, section 269F permits an individual to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO in respect of goods, provided that those goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. Section 269C stipulates that a TCO application meets the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Section 269B further defines key terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods'. If the CEO is satisfied that an application meets the core criteria, subsection 269P(3) requires the CEO to make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
Under this Act, both applicants and the CEO have specific obligations. Applicants must ensure their applications are valid and not in respect of goods listed in section 269SJ. They must also provide any relevant information necessary for the CEO to determine if the core criteria are met. The CEO, on the other hand, is required to assess the application, determine if the core criteria are met, and publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties. If no submissions are received, the CEO must proceed to make the TCO if the application meets the criteria.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not explicitly mention specific penalties for non-compliance or breach of the TCO provisions. However, general provisions under the Customs Act 1901 and associated regulations might apply. For example, unauthorised importation of goods can attract civil penalties and criminal charges, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence. Similarly, failure to comply with the terms of a TCO might lead to civil or criminal consequences as stipulated by the broader customs legislation.
The commencement of the TCO, as outlined in subsection 269S(1), is effective from the day the application for the TCO was lodged. In this specific case, TCO No. 1051147 is taken to have come into force on 18 November 2010. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities for actions taken before the registration date. Importers will benefit from this TCO as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.