Tariff Concession Order 1048297

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2011L00352 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1048297
 

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain inductor linings on 29 October 2010.

Instrument

TCO No 1048297 was made on 17 January 2011.  It declares that those certain inductor linings are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 1048297 is taken to have come into force on 29 October 2010.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide for the regulation of customs and excise, and it was introduced to address the need for a structured approach to managing and controlling the import and export of goods into and out of Australia. The Customs Act 1901 is administered by the Parliament of Australia and includes provisions for the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to provide tariff relief on certain goods under specific conditions. The Explanatory Statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1048297, made on 17 January 2011, details the process by which Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd applied for and was granted a TCO for certain inductor linings, reducing the duty rate from 5% to free. This TCO was implemented to ensure that there were no substitutable goods produced in Australia, thereby facilitating the import of these specific goods without incurring duty charges. The policy objective is to support Australian industries by providing tariff relief where appropriate, thereby encouraging the import of necessary goods that are not domestically produced.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1048297 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods that are the subject of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) application. The Act governs the process by which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) assesses and approves TCO applications, thereby reducing the rate of customs duty on certain goods. The CEO must determine that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged, as per sections 269C and 269D of the Act. In this instance, Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd applied for a TCO for certain inductor linings, which the CEO approved, resulting in a duty-free rate for these goods. This instrument operates across the Commonwealth of Australia, affecting entities involved in the import of the specified goods. The application of this TCO does not disadvantage any person by affecting their rights as at the date of registration nor impose liabilities on anyone for actions taken prior to the registration date. Importers of the affected goods may benefit from a refund of duty paid on those goods since the TCO's effective date.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1048297, under the Customs Act 1901, is a legislative tool that facilitates tariff concessions for specific goods, allowing them to benefit from a lower rate of customs duty. Section 269F of the Act outlines the process by which a person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). If the application pertains to goods that are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which lists goods ineligible for TCOs, the CEO must then determine if the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. This requires that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The definitions of "goods produced in Australia", "ordinary course of business", and "substitutable goods" are further elaborated in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F of the Act respectively. Upon satisfying these criteria, the CEO is obligated to issue a written TCO, as mandated by section 269P(3), specifying that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, effectively applying a reduced duty rate. In the case of Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd’s application for a TCO concerning certain inductor linings, Instrument No. 1048297 was issued on 17 January 2011, declaring that these goods are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, with the general duty rate of 5% being reduced to free duty. In accordance with section 269K(1) of the Act, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties who believe the TCO should not be granted. In this instance, no submissions were received. The commencement of the TCO is set on the day the application was lodged, which for TCO No. 1048297 was 29 October 2010, as per subsection 269S(1). Importantly, the TCO does not affect any pre-existing rights or impose new liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, ensuring that the rights of importers are positively impacted by allowing them to apply for a refund of duties on goods imported since the TCO's effective date. Failure to comply with the requirements or obligations set out in the Customs Act 1901 can result in various consequences. Section 274 of the Act outlines offences related to the importation of dutiable goods without the necessary approvals or in violation of tariff provisions, which can lead to penalties. For instance, under section 274, the maximum penalty for individuals can include fines up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years, or both, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. Similarly, corporate entities can face fines up to 50,000 penalty units. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the Act’s stipulations and the severe repercussions that can ensue from non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.