EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1046228
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Cigweld applied for a TCO in respect of certain welding power sources on 03 January 2011.
Instrument
TCO No 1046228 was made on 10 January 2011. It declares that those certain welding power sources are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1046228 is taken to have come into force on 03 January 2011.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a comprehensive framework for the administration of customs and excise duties. The Act was introduced to address the need for a unified legislative approach to customs regulation, which was previously governed by a patchwork of state-based laws. Part XVA of the Act provides for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, which allow for reduced customs duty rates on specified goods under certain conditions. The 2011 Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1046228, for example, was introduced following an application by Cigweld for tariff concessions on certain welding power sources. This instrument was made on the basis that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thereby satisfying the core criteria outlined in the Act. The policy objective of these concessions is to support Australian industries by making specific goods more competitively priced, thereby potentially stimulating economic activity and benefiting importers who can claim refunds for duties paid on these goods prior to the concession coming into effect.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who can reduce customs duty on specified goods if certain conditions are met. This mechanism applies to any person who can demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The scope of this Act is national, affecting all importers and exporters within Australia, as well as any businesses that rely on the importation of the specified goods. The Act does not apply to goods listed in section 269SJ, which excludes certain items from tariff concessions. The application of the Act is further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can provide more detailed criteria for what constitutes "substitutable goods" and "ordinary course of business". TCO No. 1046228, for example, was made for certain welding power sources, granting them a tariff concession that reduces the duty rate from 5% to free, effective from the date the application was lodged. The process includes public consultation, though in this instance, no submissions were received. This TCO benefits importers by allowing them to apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the effective date of the order.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, provides a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) can apply lower rates of customs duty on certain goods (s 269F). If an applicant, such as Cigweld, submits an application for a TCO for goods not specified in section 269SJ, the CEO must determine if the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. Specifically, the CEO must be satisfied that, on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (s 269C). Definitions for terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B, respectively.
Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, a written TCO must be issued, declaring that the specified goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (s 269P(3)). This TCO, in this case, TCO No. 1046228, specifies that certain welding power sources are subject to item 50 of the Tariff, resulting in a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties, although in this case, no submissions were received (s 269K(1)). The TCO is considered to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, which for TCO No. 1046228, is 03 January 2011 (s 269S(1)).
The obligations imposed by the Act require the CEO to carefully assess each application for a TCO to ensure compliance with the core criteria. This includes verifying that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application was lodged. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette to allow for any objections or submissions from interested parties, although no submissions were received for TCO No. 1046228. The Act ensures that the rights of individuals, other than the Commonwealth, are not adversely affected by the TCO, and no new liabilities are imposed. Importers, however, will benefit as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date (s 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, particularly in the context of TCOs, may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not specify the exact penalties, breaches of customs laws can typically result in fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence. For instance, under the Customs Act, significant breaches might lead to fines up to $22,000 for individuals and $110,000 for corporations, with more severe penalties applicable for repeated or egregious violations. Additionally, officers found guilty of misconduct or negligence in the performance of their duties could face disciplinary action, including dismissal or prosecution.