EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1045904
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bluescope Steel applied for a TCO in respect of certain hot strip mill spindles on 12 October 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1045904 was made on 07 January 2011. It declares that those certain hot strip mill spindles are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1045904 is taken to have come into force on 12 October 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and tariffs. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can reduce the rate of customs duty for certain goods. The Customs (Tariff Concession Orders) Instrument No. 1045904, made on 7 January 2011, applies a zero rate of duty on certain hot strip mill spindles, a decision based on the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This instrument was introduced to address the economic need for reduced customs duties on specific imported goods to support industries that do not have local production capabilities. The policy objective of the Tariff Concession Instrument is to provide tariff relief for goods that are not produced domestically, thereby potentially lowering costs and increasing competitiveness for businesses importing these goods.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, provides for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, which apply to goods for which a lower rate of customs duty is granted. This Act applies to any person who can demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia and who meets the core criteria set out in the Act. The TCO mechanism is designed to benefit Australian importers by providing tariff concessions for specific goods, as was the case with Bluescope Steel’s application for certain hot strip mill spindles, which was approved on 7 January 2011. The application of this Act is national in scope, covering the entire Commonwealth of Australia, and is subject to the terms and conditions specified in the TCOs themselves, which can be further detailed through subordinate instruments. The application process includes a requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting public submissions, although in the case of TCO No. 1045904, no submissions were received. The commencement date of the TCO is the same as the date on which the application was lodged, in this case, 12 October 2010.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which lower rates of customs duty can be applied to certain goods. A TCO can be applied for by a person under section 269F (1) of the Act, provided the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for a TCO. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) must assess whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C of the Act, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged.
The obligations under the Act require the CEO to make a decision based on the core criteria, and if met, to issue a TCO. For the purposes of a TCO, substitutable goods are defined in section 269D of the Act, ordinary course of business in section 269E, and the specific context of goods in section 269F. Once the CEO determines that an application meets these criteria, a written order must be made under subsection 269P(3) of the Act, specifying the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods in question.
In the case of Bluescope Steel’s application for a TCO concerning certain hot strip mill spindles, the CEO made TCO No 1045904 on 7 January 2011, declaring these goods to be subject to a 5% duty rate, which was reduced to free under the TCO. The CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application. This TCO came into force on 12 October 2010, the date the application was lodged, under subsection 269S(1) of the Act.
The Act also imposes certain procedural obligations, such as the requirement under subsection 269K(1) for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any person who might oppose the making of a TCO. In this instance, no submissions were received. Furthermore, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration and does not impose any liabilities on any person, as stated under the Act. Importers can benefit from this TCO by applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the date the TCO came into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches related to the creation or operation of TCOs. However, any failure to comply with the conditions set out in the TCO, or any misuse of the concession, could potentially lead to legal action or penalties as prescribed by other relevant laws or regulations. The specifics of penalties would depend on the nature of the breach and could range from fines to more severe legal actions.