EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1045654
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
MTU Detroit Diesel Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain vehicle transmissions on 08 October 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1045654 was made on 10 January 2011. It declares that those certain vehicle transmissions are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1045654 is taken to have come into force on 08 October 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duties on goods imported into Australia. In addressing gaps within this framework, particularly the need for a streamlined process to grant tariff concessions on specific imported goods, the Act was amended to include the scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This mechanism was introduced to ensure that certain imported goods receive lower duty rates if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, thereby supporting Australian industries and consumers by making imported goods more competitively priced. The policy objective underpinning this legislative measure is to foster fair trade practices and economic efficiency by adjusting customs duties to reflect the domestic production status of goods. The explanatory statement outlines that MTU Detroit Diesel Australia's application for a TCO concerning certain vehicle transmissions was approved, leading to the issuance of TCO No. 1045654, which came into force on the date of the application, 08 October 2010, and resulted in a reduction of the duty rate on these transmissions from 5% to free.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as applied through the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1045654, provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) to lower the rate of customs duty on specified goods. This legislation applies to any person or entity seeking to import goods that are not explicitly excluded under section 269SJ of the Act. The primary focus of the Act is to facilitate the import of goods that are not produced domestically in the ordinary course of business, thereby reducing the financial burden on importers. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, impacting all states and territories within Australia. The Act does not specify exclusions beyond those mentioned in section 269SJ, which likely includes goods that are prohibited or subject to special regulations. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which provides further details on the classification of goods and applicable duty rates.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1045654 are primarily encapsulated in sections 269C, 269P, and 269S of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act). Section 269C stipulates that a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) application meets the core criteria if, on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269P(3) mandates that if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must issue a written TCO declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed tariff item specified in the order. Section 269S outlines the commencement of a TCO, which is effective from the day the application was lodged, in this case, 8 October 2010. This means that the TCO for certain vehicle transmissions, which were applied for by MTU Detroit Diesel Australia, became effective on that date.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, applicants for a TCO, such as MTU Detroit Diesel Australia, must ensure that their application is made in accordance with the criteria set out in section 269C. This involves demonstrating that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the application date. Secondly, the CEO has a duty to assess whether the application meets these criteria and, if satisfied, to make a TCO. Furthermore, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any interested parties, as per subsection 269K(1). In this instance, no submissions were received, facilitating the issuance of the TCO.
The Act also delineates potential consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. Although the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, it is reasonable to infer that breaches of the requirements to properly apply for and assess TCOs could lead to legal actions under the Customs Act 1901 or associated regulations. The penalties for such breaches may include fines or other sanctions as stipulated by the relevant laws. However, the explanatory statement specifically notes that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person in respect of actions taken before the TCO's effective date.
In summary, the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1045654 is a legislative measure that facilitates reduced customs duties on certain vehicle transmissions, effective from 8 October 2010. It outlines the criteria for TCO applications and the CEO's obligations in assessing and issuing these orders. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly detail penalties for non-compliance, it ensures that the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities for pre-existing actions.