EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1041006
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Filter Tex Media applied for a TCO in respect of certain needlefelt scrim supported on 06 September 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1041006 was made on 29 November 2010. It declares that those certain needlefelt scrim supported are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1041006 is taken to have come into force on 06 September 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislative instrument, F2011L00043, aims to address the need for specific tariff concessions on certain goods by allowing for a reduced rate of customs duty. This mechanism facilitates economic benefits by reducing costs for importers of specified goods, thereby potentially encouraging trade and investment in those goods. The policy objective of this instrument is to ensure that certain goods, for which no substitutable Australian-made products exist, receive a tariff concession to support their competitive position in the market. The process involves an application by interested parties to the CEO, who must determine whether the application meets the core criteria outlined in the Act. The explanatory statement details the application process, the decision made, and the resulting tariff concession, which in this case pertains to certain needlefelt scrim supported and provides a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1041006 applies to the customs duties associated with certain needlefelt scrim supported goods, as declared by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs under the Customs Act 1901. The Act allows for the application of lower customs duties on goods specified in a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) provided that the application meets the core criteria outlined in the Act, specifically that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business at the time of the application. The application of this instrument is limited to the geographic scope of Australia and is effective as of the date on which the TCO application was lodged, in this case, 6 September 2010. It is pertinent to note that the TCO does not adversely affect any rights of persons, other than the Commonwealth, as of the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on persons for actions taken prior to the registration date. The instrument extends its application in alignment with the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which is referenced in the instrument to determine the applicable duty rates.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1041006 include section 269C (269C), which sets out the core criteria for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to consider when deciding whether to make a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Under section 269C, a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This provision ensures that the concession applies only when there is no domestic production of goods that could serve the same purpose as those for which the concession is being sought. Section 269P(3) (269P(3)) then mandates that if the CEO is satisfied the application meets the core criteria, they must make a written TCO order specifying the applicable tariff concession.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Section 269F (269F) allows a person to apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. The CEO must then determine if the application is valid and meets the criteria set out in section 269C (269C). Additionally, under subsection 269K(1) (269K(1)), the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit their views on why the TCO should not be made. The CEO must consider these submissions before making a decision. The Act also ensures that the rights of third parties, other than the Commonwealth, are not adversely affected by the TCO, as stipulated in subsection 269S(1) (269S(1)).
In terms of offences and penalties, the Act does not explicitly outline criminal or civil penalties for breaches related to the making of TCOs. However, the Act does provide for the possibility of duty refunds under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations for importers who have already paid duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force. This means that while there are no direct penalties for failing to comply with the TCO provisions, there are administrative consequences for those who import goods before the TCO is effective and subsequently seek refunds for the overpaid duties.
The Act ensures that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, including importers, except the Commonwealth, for actions taken before the TCO’s effective date. This protective clause is intended to prevent any retroactive liabilities or disadvantages to parties who were unaware of the impending tariff changes. The Act thereby balances the need for tariff concessions with the protection of stakeholders' rights and interests.