EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1038764
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Locksmith Supply Co applied for a TCO in respect of certain automotive ignition keys on 18 August 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1038764 was made on 01 November 2010. It declares that those certain automotive ignition keys are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1038764 is taken to have come into force on 18 August 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to regulate the importation and exportation of goods into and out of Australia. It provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and other charges on imported and exported goods. The Act was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive legal structure governing customs procedures, ensuring the efficient collection of duties and the regulation of trade. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1038764, issued under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, outlines the process for granting tariff concessions on specific goods. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, in accordance with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, and the policy objective is to facilitate trade by providing lower rates of customs duty on certain goods, thereby encouraging their importation into Australia.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as applied through Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1038764, applies to any person or entity seeking to import specific goods that meet the criteria for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The Act operates at the Commonwealth level, enabling the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make orders that reduce the rate of customs duty for certain goods. This instrument specifically concerns automotive ignition keys, declaring them to be subject to a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%, given that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The application of this legislation is broad, impacting importers who will benefit from the reduced duty on these goods. The instrument does not apply to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which are ineligible for a TCO.
Geographically, the scope of this Act is national, as it is enacted under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act’s application is not restricted by state or territory boundaries, thereby providing a uniform approach across Australia. The instrument’s reach is limited to the goods specified in the TCO and does not extend to any other types of goods unless they are similarly identified and meet the core criteria for a TCO. The Act’s application can be further extended or specified through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or further orders made by the CEO of Customs.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) provides a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through Part XVA, which allows for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. Section 269F enables any person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of particular goods, provided those goods do not fall under the restrictions outlined in section 269SJ. The CEO’s decision to grant a TCO hinges on whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application was lodged. This is further defined in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F, clarifying terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods'. If the application meets these criteria, the CEO must make a written order as per section 269P(3).
Under this legislation, entities such as Locksmith Supply Co can apply for a TCO to benefit from reduced customs duty rates. For example, Locksmith Supply Co applied for a TCO on 18 August 2010 for certain automotive ignition keys. Once the CEO was satisfied that the application met the core criteria, a TCO was issued on 1 November 2010, making item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applicable to these keys, thus reducing the duty rate from 5% to free. This process ensures that eligible goods receive tariff concessions without adversely affecting the rights of others or imposing new liabilities. It also provides an avenue for importers to apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the TCO came into effect.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The CEO must ensure that the application complies with the Act's provisions and that any substitutable goods were not produced in Australia. The CEO also has a duty to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties regarding the proposed TCO, as stipulated in section 269K(1). In the case of TCO No. 1038764, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. Furthermore, the Act ensures that the TCO does not negatively impact the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, nor does it impose any liabilities on such persons, thereby safeguarding against retrospective disadvantages or obligations.
The Act also outlines potential consequences for non-compliance or misuse of the TCO provisions. Although the explanatory statement does not specify detailed offences, penalties, or consequences, it is implied that any breach of the legislative requirements could result in legal actions. The penalties for non-compliance could include fines, imprisonment, or other civil and criminal repercussions as stipulated by the broader legal framework governing customs and tariffs in Australia. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, aligning with the general legal principles of the Australian legal system.