EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1033567
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Itw Zip Pak Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain plastic bag pressure seals on 22 July 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1033567 was made on 18 October 2010. It declares that those certain plastic bag pressure seals are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1033567 is taken to have come into force on 22 July 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation of imports and exports in Australia, including the imposition of customs duties. Part XVA of the Act establishes a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders allow for a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods. The problem or gap that this legislation addresses is the need to provide relief to importers and consumers by reducing the customs duty on certain goods, provided that these goods are not produced in Australia and there are no substitutable goods available domestically. The policy objective is to facilitate trade and ensure that Australian consumers benefit from lower prices on imported goods where appropriate. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1033567, made under this Act, specifically addresses an application by Zip Pak Australia for tariff concessions on certain plastic bag pressure seals, resulting in a reduction of the duty rate from 5% to free.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1033567 applies to certain plastic bag pressure seals and is made under Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901. It provides a concession by allowing these specific goods to be imported tariff-free, thereby applying a zero rate of duty. This is applicable to entities and individuals importing these goods, and specifically benefits importers who may now be eligible for duty refunds on goods imported since 22 July 2010, the date the application for the Tariff Concession Order (TCO) was lodged. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across Australia in accordance with the Commonwealth's customs laws. The Act does not impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth and does not disadvantage any person by affecting their rights as at the date of registration. The application of the TCO does not extend to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which outlines those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The Act may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, though the specific TCO No. 1033567 does not impose any new liabilities and only benefits importers of the specified goods.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of this legislation are sections 269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, and 269P of the Customs Act 1901. These sections collectively establish the criteria for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) and the conditions under which a TCO can be issued. Section 269C stipulates that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Sections 269B, 269D, and 269E provide definitions for key terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods." Section 269P(3) mandates that if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, a written order (TCO) must be made.
The Customs Act 1901 imposes several obligations on the parties involved in the TCO process. For instance, under section 269F, any person can apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods, provided these goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which outlines those that cannot be subject to a TCO. The CEO has the responsibility to determine whether the application meets the core criteria as defined in section 269C. Additionally, under section 269K(1), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission. The CEO is also required to consider any submissions received before making a final decision.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences mentioned in the text for breach of the provisions in this legislation. However, it is worth noting that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. This means that while the rights of importers will be beneficially affected, the legislation is careful to ensure that no existing rights or liabilities are adversely impacted by the issuance of a TCO.
In summary, the main provisions of this legislation revolve around the creation and application of Tariff Concession Orders, with specific criteria and processes outlined in the Customs Act 1901. The obligations are primarily placed on the CEO to assess applications and consider public submissions, while ensuring that the rights of non-Commonwealth parties are not adversely affected. The legislation does not specify penalties for non-compliance but ensures that the rights and liabilities of individuals and entities are protected.