EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1031200
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Flyto Green Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain urea formaldehyde resins on 09 July 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1031200 was made on 29 September 2010. It declares that those certain urea formaldehyde resins are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1031200 is taken to have come into force on 09 July 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties, among other things. One specific mechanism within this framework is the ability for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under section 269F, thereby reducing the rate of customs duty on certain goods. This legislative instrument, F2010L02956, addresses the gap by facilitating tariff concessions for particular goods not produced domestically, thus promoting economic efficiency and competitiveness in the market. The policy objective is to ensure that Australian businesses are not unduly disadvantaged by high customs duties on goods for which no domestic substitutes exist. In this case, the TCO No. 1031200 was issued following an application by Flyto Green Australia for certain urea formaldehyde resins, resulting in the elimination of customs duty for these goods. The TCO ensures that no existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected, and it allows importers to apply for duty refunds on imports made since the order's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through its Part XVA, provides a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation applies to any individual or entity that seeks to import goods eligible for tariff concessions. Such concessions are granted when the CEO determines that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia and that the application meets specific criteria outlined in the Act. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth jurisdiction. Exclusions apply to goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for tariff concessions. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For instance, the application for TCO No. 1031200, concerning certain urea formaldehyde resins, was processed under this legislative framework, leading to a concession that effectively reduced the duty rate from 5% to free for the specified goods, commencing from the date the application was lodged.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Customs Act 1901 (section 269C) establish the core criteria that must be met for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) to be granted. Specifically, for a TCO to be considered, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs must be satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged (section 269F). The definitions of key terms such as "goods produced in Australia", "ordinary course of business" and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E and 269G respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that these criteria are met, they must make a written TCO order (section 269P(3)) specifying the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods in question.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The CEO is required to consider each TCO application against the specified core criteria and, if satisfied, must proceed to issue the TCO. Section 269K(1) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any person who believes the TCO should not be granted to submit their reasons. The Act ensures that the rights of importers are protected and can benefit from the concessions provided by the TCO. Importers can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the date the TCO is deemed to have come into force (section 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
In terms of penalties and consequences for breach, the Act does not explicitly state any offences or penalties for non-compliance with the TCO provisions. However, any failure to adhere to the terms of the TCO or to comply with the conditions set forth in the Act could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative actions. The Act ensures that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration (section 269S(1)).
The explanatory statement clarifies that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person and provides that the rights of importers will be beneficially affected. This suggests that while there are no explicit penalties for non-compliance, the Act is designed to ensure that the rights and interests of all parties are protected and that the concessions are granted fairly and in accordance with the stipulated criteria.